ICI Myocarditishold ICI IV methylprednisolone 1 g/d × 3 d then taper after objective response. Urgent specialist escalation for deterioration or inadequate response. Adjunctive immunosuppression is individualized. 25–50% mortality in fulminant cases. Permanent discontinuation.
Anthracycline acute HFAcute symptomatic HF → hold, urgent assessment + phenotype-directed GDMT. Anthracycline restart is an MDT decision after recovery. Consider dexrazoxane / liposomal options.
Hypertensive crisisVEGF/TKI: SBP ≥180 or DBP ≥110 → hold, assess end-organ injury. IV therapy for hypertensive emergency. Reassess restart below 160/100, subject to product-label restrictions.
QTc ≥500 ms / Torsadeshold the agent. For torsades: IV magnesium and urgent rhythm care. Correct K⁺/Mg²⁺ and stop QT drugs. Pace if pause-dependent. Permanently d/c after Torsades (esp. ribociclib).
5-FU / Capecitabine ACSstop exposure, ECG/troponin + ACS evaluation. Nitrates/CCB for vasospasm. Exclude obstructive CAD. Rechallenge only after MDT review, prophylaxis, and a monitored plan.
01
Baseline CV risk assessment
Before cancer therapy
HFA-ICOS pre-treatment workup
History prior HF / CAD / valve · cumulative anthracycline · chest RT · smoking · DM · HTN · CKD · pregnancy / late effects of childhood Ca.
Exam + vitals BP both arms · HR · weight · JVP · edema · murmur.
ECG if pre-existing CVD / CV risk, or the planned therapy is associated with arrhythmia or high CV-toxicity risk.
LV imaging for drugs associated with LV dysfunction: TTE + GLS if available. CMR if echo quality is poor. MUGA if TTE is unavailable or infeasible.
Biomarkers consider baseline hs-troponin · BNP for HIGH / V·HIGH risk rather than as a universal bundle.
Labs lipids + A1c within 6 mo for systemic therapy. CBC · BMP · Mg / K · TSH according to regimen and comorbidity.
Stratify before cycle 1
Combine the therapy-specific HFA-ICOS proforma with patient factors to assign LOWMEDHIGHV·HIGH. The tier informs monitoring, HIGH / V·HIGH referral, and multidisciplinary risk–benefit review. It is not itself a drug-hold rule.
Primary prevention candidates
No routine prophylactic CV drug bundle Evidence does not support starting an ACEi/ARB, β-blocker, statin, or SGLT2i solely for primary CTR-CVT prevention. Treat standard CV indications. A specialist may select neurohormonal therapy or a statin in HIGH / V·HIGH risk.
Anthracycline mitigation in HIGH-risk patients needing further therapy, consider dexrazoxane or a liposomal formulation, particularly near/above cumulative doxorubicin 250 mg/m² or with pre-existing cardiomyopathy.
Lifestyle + risk factors exercise · smoking cessation · healthy diet · weight. CPS targets: A1c <7 · BP <130/80 · LDL <70. Individualize during active therapy.
02
Surveillance principles
Echo · biomarkers · ECG cadence
Echo / GLS cadence
Anthracycline baseline LV imaging when dysfunction risk is present. Follow the drug/risk schedule. At 12 mo post-Tx, echo if early-stage/curative intent and cumulative doxorubicin ≥ 250 mg/m² or equivalent.
HER2 baseline LV imaging + drug-specific on-Tx surveillance. Echo at 12 mo post-Tx.
VEGF / TKI baseline · q3–6 mo if CV risk factors.
BRAF/MEK baseline · 1 mo · then q3 mo.
Survivorship after adult-onset cancer therapy: annual symptoms + CV risk-factor review. Re-stratify at 5 y. Childhood-cancer survivors follow their separate exposure-based pathway.
Long-term echo MODERATE risk: q5y may be considered (IIb-C). HIGH / V·HIGH: years 1, 3, 5, then q5y (IIa-C). Evidence is limited.
Biomarkers
hs-Tn / ECG ICI: baseline and early-cycle surveillance per risk pathway. New symptoms, troponin rise or conduction change → urgent clinical assessment, then targeted TTE/CMR. Do not wait for imaging if unstable.
BNP echo cadence + at any new dyspnea / volume change.
Trend > absolute — the patient is their own control only while modality, acquisition, loading, rhythm, vendor/software, and analysis remain comparable. Exclude technically invalid trend points.
ECG / electrolytes
Pre-dose for any QT-prolonger. Review interacting drugs.
Ribociclib ECG before therapy and ~day 14 of cycle 1, then as indicated. Start only if QTcF <450 ms. Correct electrolytes.
Vandetanib / arsenic follow distinct label ECG and electrolyte schedules. Increase monitoring if unstable.
03
Therapy-specific decision rules
When to hold · who to call
EF drop trigger (asymptomatic CTRCD)
Confirm LVEF/GLS and symptoms. Asymptomatic EF 40–49%: interrupt anthracycline. Selected HER2 therapy may continue with ACEi/ARB + BB and close monitoring. Follow the exact agent label and MDT plan.
Symptomatic HF (any cause)
New HF symptoms → hold diurese, GDMT (ARNI/ACE/ARB + BB + MRA + SGLT2 as tolerated). CV consult. Echo + biomarkers. Rule out ischemia.
QTc thresholds
Use QTcF: 480–500 ms → correct causes + closer monitoring. ≥500 ms → hold. Δ >60 ms alone below 500 is not an automatic hold. Stricter agent-label rules apply, including ribociclib and arsenic.
Hypertension (any agent)
Treat elevated BP. ≥160/100 generally needs ACEi/ARB + DHP-CCB. ≥180 systolic or ≥110 diastolic → hold culprit therapy pending control. Emergency = end-organ injury. Product labels may require earlier holds.
When to call cardio-onc
New CVD · LVEF <53% and/or relative GLS drop >15% · new arrhythmia · uncontrolled CV risk factors · important DDI concern. These CPS examples prompt evaluation/referral, not an automatic cancer-therapy hold.
B
Biomarker thresholds at a glance
Assay · context · serial change
hs-Troponinng/L
≥ 99th percentile ULN + symptoms → CMR + cardiac consult. Interpret assay variation, renal disease, ischemia and myositis. During ICI therapy, a new rise requires urgent myocarditis assessment, not an automatic diagnosis.
BNPpg/mL
BNP > 35 (NT-proBNP > 125 equiv.) abnormal in non-acute setting. Rising trend → echo. Consider diuresis if volume-overloaded.
LVEF% by 3D / GLS
New EF <40%: severe asymptomatic CTRCD. EF 40–49%: moderate if fall ≥10 points, or a smaller fall plus new GLS/biomarker abnormality. EF ≥50%: mild only with new GLS/biomarker abnormality.
GLS% relative Δ
Subclinical injury signal: Δ > 15% relative drop from baseline. Confirm comparability and refer/evaluate. This signal alone is not an automatic hold criterion.
R
Baseline risk domains — not a scoring substitute
Use the therapy-specific proforma
Cardiac history
HF · CAD · MI · valvular · AF · prior cardiotoxic Tx
Imaging
EF < 50% · GLS reduced · ↑ LV mass · diastolic dysfn
Biomarkers
↑ hs-Tn · ↑ BNP at baseline
Demographics
Age ≥ 65 · pediatric · pregnancy · ethnicity (S Asian, AA)
How to read the cards that follow
Each drug class is one block: agents (US brand + generic) · use / benefit · CV & non-cardiac toxicity · its HFA-ICOS mini-score (or a note where no proforma exists) · surveillance · and a granular, grade-tiered management plan with doses and hold / resume / rechallenge thresholds. CRS uses ASTCT. Grade by the worse hypotension/hypoxia domain. Fever need not persist after antipyretic or anti-cytokine therapy. A troponin rise alone is not a CTCAE v5 myocarditis grade. The 2026 ASTCT consensus retains the CRS framework with clarifications. ICANS assessment for developmental limitations or abnormal baseline cognition follows that updated consensus.
W
Worked example — patient → HFA-ICOS tier → action
New to cardio-onc? This is the workflow every card supports
1 · The patient
68 F · HER2+ breast Ca · h/o HTN · prior doxorubicin 240 mg/m² · baseline EF 53%, GLS −16% (borderline). Now starting trastuzumab.
→
2 · Count points
Age 68 2 + HTN 1 + EF 53% 2 = 5 medium points → HIGH already. Remote anthracycline adds 2, or current sequential anthracycline adds 1. Borderline GLS is not a separate High-tier factor.
→
3 · Tier
HIGH
→
4 · Action
Refer cardio-onc · baseline echo+GLS. Consider hs-Tn/BNP · optimize standard CV indications. Discuss rather than automatically start prophylactic ACEi/BB · follow the trastuzumab surveillance plan.
UseBreast · HL / NHL · AML / ALL · sarcoma · gastric. Curative-intent backbone.Benefit≈ 33% ↓ breast-Ca mortality. > 80% cure in Hodgkin (ABVD). Core of AML 7+3 & pediatric ALL — often irreplaceable.
CV toxicity
HFrEF / CTRCD: cumulative-dose injury with variable recovery. Historical doxorubicin trials estimated CHF in 5% at 400 and 26% at 550 mg/m². These are cohort estimates, not individual thresholds.
Cumulative exposure increases risk. ≥250 mg/m² doxorubicin flags higher surveillance risk. There is no universally safe dose or absolute 550 mg/m² prohibition.
A new GLS decline or troponin rise may precede LVEF decline. Neither appears in every case, and alternative causes must be assessed.
Acute arrhythmia / myopericarditis during infusion (rare).
Baseline CV Hx · BP · ECG if CVD/risk or arrhythmia risk · echo + GLS. Consider hs-Tn/BNP if HIGH / V·HIGH.
Echo + GLS on-Tx per drug/risk. 12 mo post if early-stage/curative and cumulative doxorubicin ≥250 mg/m². Longer intervals by risk.
hs-Tn each cycle if high-risk — trend > absolute.
Management — granular
PREHFA-ICOS High / V-High → cardio-onc/MDT review. Optimize standard CV indications. Do not automatically start ACEi/ARB, BB, statin, or SGLT2i solely for CTR-CVT prophylaxis. Specialist-selected neurohormonal/statin therapy may be considered.
MILDΔ GLS >15% rel. or new ↑Tn with EF ≥50% → validate the trend + cardio-onc review. Consider ACEi/ARB + BB as appropriate. do not automatically hold chemo.
CTRCDModerate/severe asymptomatic CTRCD or symptomatic HF → interrupt anthracycline and assess urgently. Treat the HF phenotype, confirm the trajectory and agree on reassessment with the MDT.
PROTDexrazoxane: labeled cardioprotection in women with metastatic breast cancer continuing doxorubicin after 300 mg/m². Broader high-risk use may be off-label. Ratio 10:1. Reduce 50% if CrCl <40. Verify product/timing.
RESUMERechallenge after recovery only by MDT risk–benefit review. Optimize HF therapy, exposure mitigation, and monitoring. No universal EF/4-week restart rule.
FactoidDexrazoxane and liposomal formulations can reduce anthracycline cardiac injury. Cumulative exposure and baseline susceptibility still matter.
≥1 V·HIGH → V·High · any HIGH or ≥5 MED-pts → High · 2–4 → Med · 0–1 → Low
HTN is the commonest VEGF AE — counts HIGH here.
Surveillance
BP each visit. Home BP daily during the first cycle, after dose increases, then every 2–3 weeks. Reassess antihypertensives when VEGF therapy stops.
Baseline + periodic ECG (QTc) if QT-risk drug / DDI.
Echo if symptoms. TFTs q cycle. UPCR periodically.
Management — granular
HTNSBP 140–159 / DBP 90–99 → treat with ACEi/ARB or DHP-CCB as appropriate. Generally continue VEGF with monitoring.
G3 HTNSBP ≥160 / DBP ≥100 → intensify to ACEi/ARB + DHP-CCB. Review the label. Hold at ≥180 systolic / ≥110 diastolic or for uncontrolled severe HTN.
G4 HTNAcute end-organ injury → admit and titrated IV therapy. Restart or permanent cessation follows the agent label. Do not use an oral-agent-count rule.
LVSDEF ↓ ≥10 pt to <50% → hold + GDMT (ACE/ARB + BB ± SGLT2i). Echo 2–4 wk.
QTcQTcF ≥500 ms → hold, correct electrolytes/DDIs. Restart by label. Δ >60 ms alone below 500 warrants review, not automatic interruption.
MONTreat thyroid dysfunction. Monitor proteinuria. Proteinuria hold thresholds are agent-specific. Evaluate nephrotic syndrome or renal injury.
FactoidVEGF-pathway hypertension can occur early. Treat BP to preserve therapy when feasible. Hypertension is not a validated individual tumor-response test. Severe or uncontrolled BP can require interruption.
≥1 V·HIGH → V·High · any HIGH or ≥5 MED-pts → High · 2–4 → Med · 0–1 → Low
Summary only. The complete VEGF proforma also includes QTc 450–<480 (M) / 460–<480 (F) as 2 medium points. Monitoring remains drug-specific.
Surveillance
BP every cycle. Home log if elevated.
Monitor urine protein per label. For bevacizumab, dipstick ≥2+ prompts 24-hour quantification. Hold at ≥2 g/24 h and discontinue for nephrotic syndrome.
Perioperative holds are agent-specific. Bevacizumab: ≥28 days before elective surgery and ≥28 days after major surgery, with adequate healing.
Management — granular
G3 HTNBevacizumab: hold severe HTN uncontrolled with medical therapy. Resume after control. Stop permanently for hypertensive crisis/encephalopathy.
VTETreat VTE with an appropriate anticoagulant. Stop bevacizumab for grade 4 VTE. Other continuation decisions require oncology review.
BLEEDG3–4 hemorrhage or GI perforation/fistula → discontinue. Surgical / IR management.
SURGBevacizumab: hold ≥28 d before elective surgery and ≥28 d after major surgery, until healed. Other agents differ.
FactoidAnti-VEGF agents are not interchangeable. Bevacizumab and ramucirumab both carry arterial-event warnings. Ramucirumab requires permanent discontinuation after an arterial thromboembolic event.
ICI myocarditis is uncommon but can be fatal. A multicenter registry reported prevalence 1.14% and median onset 34 days (IQR 21–75). Late presentations occur. Normal LVEF does not exclude severe disease.
Pericarditis · arrhythmia / high-grade AV block · Takotsubo.
No HFA-ICOS proformaNo formal HFA-ICOS proforma for ICI. Use general baseline CV risk assessment (P.1) + baseline troponin/ECG. A new troponin rise requires urgent evaluation for myocarditis and competing causes.
Surveillance
Baseline ECG + hs-Tn + CK ± BNP before cycle 1.
Repeat hs-Tn / ECG with first 1–3 cycles (highest-risk window).
Low threshold for echo / cardiac MRI on any new symptom.
Management — granular
SUSPAny troponin rise + symptom → hold ICI admit, telemetry, echo + CMR. CK / aldolase for myositis overlap.
TREATIV methylprednisolone 500–1000 mg/day ×3–5 d when myocarditis is likely. Follow clinical/Tn response and an individualized oral taper.
REFRACTDeterioration or inadequate response by 48–72 h → urgent specialist review for additional immunosuppression and circulatory/respiratory support. No automatic multidrug regimen.
ARRHYHigh-grade AV block or VT → urgent rhythm support and continuous monitoring. Monitoring duration follows electrical/hemodynamic stability and the specialist plan, not troponin normalization alone.
RECHALPermanently discontinue after confirmed grade ≥2 myocarditis. Treat concurrent irAEs with organ-specific steroids.
FactoidA rising troponin with normal early LVEF is the warning sign — treat on suspicion with pulse steroids. Don't await biopsy. Abatacept is emerging for steroid-refractory disease.
No HFA-ICOS proformaNo HFA-ICOS proforma. Pre-treat per general CV risk (P.1). ASTCT CRS grade (not CTCAE) drives cardiac risk — see grading reference.
Surveillance
Baseline echo + ECG + troponin / BNP before infusion.
Continuous telemetry & daily troponin during CRS.
Echo for hypotension unresponsive to fluids / tocilizumab.
Management — granular
G1 CRSFever ≥38°C, no hypotension/hypoxia → supportive. Antipyretics. Rule out infection. Telemetry.
G2 CRSGrade 2 CRS: cellular-therapy pathway, cautious fluid and oxygen support. Tocilizumab in patients ≥30 kg: 8 mg/kg IV, maximum 800 mg. Repeat no sooner than 8 h, maximum four doses, if indicated.
G3 CRSGrade 3 CRS: ICU, vasopressor/oxygen support and product-specific tocilizumab/steroid treatment. Assess LV function and avoid indiscriminate fluid loading.
G4 CRSGrade 4 CRS: multiple pressors excluding vasopressin and/or positive-pressure ventilation. ICU and cellular-therapy team direct corticosteroids and organ support.
ARRHYAF/VT during CRS → ACLS. GDMT if persistent LV dysfunction after recovery.
FactoidIn the Alvi cohort, each 12-h delay to tocilizumab was associated with 1.7-fold higher CV-event risk. This observational association supports prompt CRS recognition, not a causal dosing deadline.
UseLymphoma · leukemia · myeloma · breast · ovarian · sarcoma · SCT conditioning.BenefitBackbone of curative combination & transplant-conditioning regimens.
CV toxicity
High-dose cyclophosphamide can cause acute hemorrhagic myocarditis and HF. Risk depends on dose and conditioning regimen. Do not apply one incidence or threshold to all alkylators.
Pericarditis · arrhythmia (AF) · rare tamponade.
Risk ↑ with prior anthracycline / chest RT. Usually within 1–3 wk.
Non-cardiac toxicity
Myelosuppression · hemorrhagic cystitis (cyclo / ifos — give mesna).
PERICPericarditis / effusion → NSAID/colchicine if no thrombocytopenia. Echo for tamponade → drainage.
CYSTPrevent hemorrhagic cystitis with regimen-specific mesna and hydration. Balance fluid against cardiac and renal reserve. New hematuria needs evaluation, not automatic fluid escalation.
METABCorrect Na⁺ for SIADH. methylene blue for ifosfamide encephalopathy.
FactoidCyclophosphamide injury may occur within days of high-dose exposure. Current dose, prior treatment and baseline cardiac reserve all matter.
DRUGS
mTOR InhibitorsEverolimus / temsirolimus (± VEGF)
CLASS
AgentsEverolimus (Afinitor) · Temsirolimus (Torisel) — often combined with VEGF TKIs / bevacizumab.
UseRCC · neuroendocrine tumors · HR+ breast (everolimus + exemestane) · TSC.BenefitAdds PFS in RCC / NET. Everolimus + exemestane doubles PFS in HR+ mBC.
No HFA-ICOS proformaNo HFA-ICOS proforma. Metabolic (lipids, glucose, BP) toxicity dominates — manage per Primary Prevention card (P.14).
Surveillance
Baseline ECG / BP / lipids / glucose.
Home BP q3 mo × 1 y, then q6 mo. Fasting lipids & glucose periodically.
Chest imaging for pneumonitis.
Management — granular
HTNTreat HTN with an interaction-aware agent. Avoid concomitant ACE inhibitors with everolimus because angioedema risk is increased. Review CYP3A4/P-gp interactions.
LIPIDStatin for mTOR dyslipidemia (rosuva / prava — review CYP and transporter interactions). Tight glucose control.
PNEUMGrade ≥2 pneumonitis → hold mTOR + steroids. Dose-reduce for stomatitis.
RENALProteinuria, hematuria or AKI → renal assessment. Treat arterial events and venous thrombosis by their distinct pathways and bleeding risk.
FactoidThe dominant CV liability is metabolic — dyslipidemia (up to ~75%) and new hyperglycemia — not direct myocardial injury. Manage with statin + glycemic control, rarely cessation.
UseHER2+ breast (adjuvant & metastatic) · HER2+ gastric / GEJ · HER2-low.BenefitAdjuvant trastuzumab ↓ recurrence ≈50%. T-DXd transformed HER2+/HER2-low mBC.
CV toxicity
HER2-related LV dysfunction often improves with interruption/HF therapy but recovery is not assured. Risk varies by agent, trial definition and prior anthracycline exposure.
Symptomatic HF <1–4%. Mostly recovers off-drug.
Risk ↑ with concurrent / sequential anthracycline & left chest RT.
Non-cardiac toxicity
Infusion reactions. T-DXd ILD / pneumonitis — can be fatal. Monitor.
≥1 V·HIGH → V·High · any HIGH or ≥5 MED-pts → High · 2–4 → Med · 0–1 → Low
HIGH if anthracycline + trastuzumab given concurrently.
Surveillance
Baseline echo. Consider hs-Tn/BNP at HIGH / V·HIGH risk.
Echo per drug/risk during therapy and at 12 mo post-Tx.
Chest imaging for new dyspnea / cough (ILD).
Management — granular
MODERATEAsymptomatic EF 40–49%: ESC supports continuing selected HER2 therapy with ACEi/ARB + BB and frequent monitoring. Reconcile the specific product label.
HOLDAsymptomatic EF <40% or moderate/severe symptomatic CTRCD → hold, HF treatment + MDT. Mild symptoms require individualized discussion.
RESUMEESC: consider restart when asymptomatic and EF ≥40% (ideally ≥50%), with HF therapy and close surveillance. Agent-label criteria may differ.
ILDT-DXd: hold + steroids for any-grade ILD. Permanently d/c for grade ≥2 pneumonitis.
SEQSequence (not concurrent) with anthracycline where possible. If HFA-ICOS HIGH / V·HIGH, refer and consider specialist-selected cardioprotection rather than automatic prophylaxis.
FactoidRecovery is possible, not guaranteed. The historical type I/type II split is too rigid. For T-DXd, evaluate new respiratory symptoms for ILD as well as HF.
LVSDTrametinib: asymptomatic LVEF fall ≥10 points below the lower limit of normal → withhold up to 4 weeks. Restart at lower dose only after recovery. Apply separate dabrafenib rules.
QTcQTcF ≥500 ms → hold culprit QT drug, correct K⁺/Mg²⁺ and DDIs. Delta alone below 500 is not a generic hold. Follow the product label.
RESUMERestart BRAF/MEK therapy only after agent-specific recovery criteria and MDT review. The MEK and BRAF labels have different hold/dose rules.
HTNTreat per CTCAE grade (ACEi/ARB ± CCB). Anticoagulate VTE.
FactoidMEK-associated LV decline may recover. Recovery and restart are agent-specific. Trametinib requires permanent cessation for symptomatic cardiomyopathy or persistent non-recovery by label criteria.
BP / lipids / glucose q3–6 mo (esp. ponatinib, nilotinib).
Echo + BNP if dyspnea (dasatinib PAH). ECG for QT on nilotinib.
Management — granular
PREOptimize CV risk factors. statin (rosuvastatin 5–10 mg) + ASA where indicated. Choose lowest-CV-risk TKI for high-risk patients.
ATENew ACS, limb ischemia or stroke → urgent vascular care and oncology review. Hold/stop or change the TKI according to toxicity, resistance mutation, cancer status and label. No automatic substitute fits every CML patient.
PAHSuspected dasatinib PAH → PH assessment and RHC. Echo pressure alone is not diagnostic. Permanently stop dasatinib for RHC-confirmed PAH. Select an alternative.
QTcNilotinib QTc >480 ms → hold and correct causes. Follow formulation-specific restart criteria and ECG after dose changes.
MONQuarterly BP / lipids / glucose. ABPI if claudication. Echo if dyspnea.
FactoidSignature vessels: ponatinib→arterial occlusion, nilotinib→PAD, dasatinib→PAH. imatinib is CV-favorable.
UseHR+ / HER2− metastatic & high-risk early breast Ca. Trilaciclib myeloprotection (SCLC).Benefit+ PFS ≈ 8–12 mo vs endocrine alone. Ribociclib OS advantage (MONALEESA).
CV toxicity
Ribociclib dose-dependent QT prolongation≈3%.
Rare AF. VTE (abemaciclib).
No meaningful LV dysfunction signal. QT additive with other QT drugs.
Non-cardiac toxicity
Neutropenia (palbo / ribo) — dose-limiting.
Diarrhea (abemaciclib). Fatigue · nausea.
Hepatotoxicity (ribociclib). Rare ILD.
No HFA-ICOS proformaNo HFA-ICOS proforma. QT risk is the cardiac issue — baseline + serial ECG for ribociclib. General CV risk otherwise.
Surveillance
Ribociclib: ECG before treatment, approximately day 14 of cycle 1, then as indicated. Start only with QTcF <450 ms. Check electrolytes at baseline and cycle starts for the first six cycles.
UseColorectal · breast · pancreas · gastric · head & neck · AML / MDS · ALL.BenefitBackbone of FOLFOX / FOLFIRI & adjuvant CRC. AML CR ≈ 70% with cytarabine.
CV toxicity
Coronary vasospasm / ACS1–10% on 5-FU / capecitabine.
Usually no fixed obstruction. Chest pain during infusion.
Arrhythmia · rare Takotsubo · sudden death. Risk ↑ with continuous infusion, high dose & CAD.
Non-cardiac toxicity
Myelosuppression. Mucositis · diarrhea.
Hand-foot syndrome (capecitabine).
DPD deficiency toxicity — severe / fatal. MTX nephro-/hepatotoxicity.
No HFA-ICOS proformaNo HFA-ICOS proforma. Use general CV risk (P.1). CAD & prior vasospasm are the key flags before fluoropyrimidine.
Surveillance
Baseline CV history and ECG. In symptomatic CVD, assess LV function. CAD screening is considered selectively in high-risk patients, not as an automatic stress test for every prior CAD diagnosis.
Telemetry for high-risk infusions. ECG with chest pain.
Test for DPYD variants before systemic fluorouracil or capecitabine unless immediate treatment is necessary. Avoid in complete DPD deficiency. A negative test does not eliminate toxicity risk.
RECHALAvoid rechallenge if confirmed. If essential, prefer bolus over infusion + dose-reduce, or switch to raltitrexed/S-1.
PROPHYEssential rechallenge requires MDT agreement, exclusion of severe CAD, long-acting nitrate/CCB prophylaxis and monitored re-exposure. Drug choice and dose are individualized. There is no universal prophylactic infusion schedule.
DPDFor overdose or early severe/life-threatening fluoropyrimidine toxicity, obtain urgent oncology/toxicology input for uridine triacetate within 96 h of the end of exposure. Later efficacy is unestablished.
FactoidFluoropyrimidine chest pain can reflect vasospasm, ACS or other injury. A clean angiogram is not guaranteed. Stop exposure and assess urgently. Rechallenge evidence comes mainly from selected series.
GnRH-antagonist CV benefit is suggestive, not settled. HERO favored relugolix, while the adjudicated PRONOUNCE trial stopped early and was inconclusive.
Non-cardiac toxicity
Osteoporosis / fracture. Hot flashes. Sexual dysfunction.
Insulin resistance · weight gain · sarcopenia.
Enzalutamide seizure / falls. Darolutamide best CNS profile.
No HFA-ICOS proformaNo HFA-ICOS proforma. Treat as ASCVD primary/secondary prevention — see Primary Prevention card (P.14).
Surveillance
Baseline ASCVD · BP · lipids · A1c · DEXA.
BP / lipids / glucose q3–6 mo.
ECG if QT risk. Bone-density monitoring on long-term ADT.
Management — granular
PREAggressive risk-factor control + statin per 2026 lipid goals. Lifestyle. prefer GnRH antagonist (relugolix) if established CVD.
EVENTAfter a CV event, stabilize the event and jointly reassess ADT choice. A GnRH antagonist may be considered, but switching is not a proven universal secondary-prevention strategy.
ABIRAAbiraterone → monitor K⁺, BP, LFTs. Correct hypokalemia. Hold for severe HTN / HF.
BONEAssess fracture risk and bone density during ADT. Use antiresorptive treatment when osteoporosis, fracture risk or an oncologic indication warrants it. Ensure adequate calcium/vitamin D, renal and dental review.
QTcAR inhibitors (enzalutamide, apalutamide) — ECG if QT-prolonging co-meds. Correct lytes. Darolutamide has best safety profile.
FactoidTwo trials answer different questions. HERO reported fewer unadjudicated MACE with relugolix. PRONOUNCE compared degarelix with leuprolide in established ASCVD but was underpowered after early termination.
≥1 V·HIGH → V·High · any HIGH or ≥5 MED-pts → High · 2–4 → Med · 0–1 → Low
Screen for AL amyloidosis at very-high risk (CMR ± biopsy).
Surveillance
Cardio-onc eval + BNP before carfilzomib.
Home BP monitoring + BNP q cycle. Echo if symptoms.
Careful IV-fluid management on carfilzomib days.
Management — granular
PRECarfilzomib: BNP + echo baseline. VTE prophylaxis with IMiDs (ASA if low risk, LMWH/DOAC if high).
HFNew HF symptoms → urgent clinical assessment, TTE and volume/BP review. BNP elevation alone is not an automatic hold. Withhold carfilzomib for grade 3–4 cardiac toxicity until recovery.
RESUMEAfter recovery, consider a one-level lower carfilzomib dose only after individualized benefit–risk review. EF recovery alone does not establish safe rechallenge.
NEUROBortezomib neuropathy → switch IV → subcut, weekly dosing, or dose-reduce. Acyclovir prophylaxis.
VTEIMiD thromboprophylaxis: use a validated myeloma VTE assessment and current hematology guidance, balancing platelets, bleeding, renal function and interactions. Avoid a crude factor-count rule.
FactoidCarfilzomib (irreversible) causes far more HF/HTN than bortezomib, peaking early — often reversible if caught fast.
Bleeding / bruising (platelet dysfunction) — caution with anticoagulants.
Infection risk. Diarrhea. Arthralgia.
Cytopenias.
No HFA-ICOS proformaNo HFA-ICOS proforma. AF & HTN are the key signals — baseline ECG + BP, then symptom-driven.
Surveillance
Baseline ECG / BP. Pulse checks for AF each visit.
Home BP monitoring during initiation and dose changes, then regularly throughout BTK therapy. Review BP and pulse at clinical visits.
Symptomatic palpitations → Holter / ECG.
Management — granular
AFNew AF → assess stability and triggers. β-blocker rate control is often preferred. Avoid verapamil/diltiazem when CYP3A4 interactions or LV dysfunction make them unsuitable. Individualize anticoagulation and bleeding review.
ACAvoid warfarin + ibrutinib. Prefer DOAC (apixaban) — screen CYP3A4 DDIs. Hold around procedures for bleeding risk.
UseEGFR-mutant NSCLC (1st-line & adjuvant). Erlotinib + gemcitabine in pancreas.BenefitOsimertinib median OS ≈ 38.6 mo in EGFR+ NSCLC. Adjuvant DFS benefit.
CV toxicity
Osimertinib — uncommon ↓ EF / HF. QTc prolongation.
Rare cardiomyopathy reversible on hold.
Low overall CV burden.
Non-cardiac toxicity
Acneiform rash · paronychia · pruritus.
Diarrhea. Stomatitis.
ILD / pneumonitis — uncommon but serious. Hepatotoxicity.
No HFA-ICOS proformaNo HFA-ICOS proforma. Baseline ECG (osimertinib QTc). Otherwise general CV risk.
Surveillance
Baseline ECG. Repeat if QT risk / DDIs.
Echo if osimertinib + cardiac risk / symptoms.
Monitor for new dyspnea / cough (ILD).
Management — granular
QTcOsimertinib QTc >500 on ≥2 ECGs → hold. Restart 40 mg at QTc <481 or baseline if baseline ≥481, per label.
LVSDOsimertinib: assess LV decline with cardiology. permanently discontinue for symptomatic CHF per label. HF therapy as indicated.
ILDHold + steroids for pneumonitis (can be fatal).
DERMTopical / oral antibiotics for rash. Loperamide for diarrhea.
AFOsimertinib new AF → rate control. Anticoagulate per CHA₂DS₂-VASc. Continue drug unless hemodynamically unstable.
FactoidOsimertinib can cause QT prolongation and cardiomyopathy. Symptomatic CHF requires permanent discontinuation under the US label, even if LVEF later improves.
LIPIDStatin for lorlatinib dyslipidemia (start early). Treat HTN per grade.
QTcQTc ≥501 ms → hold. Correct K⁺/Mg²⁺.
ILDHold + steroids for pneumonitis / G3 hepatotoxicity.
EDEMAFluid retention (crizotinib, lorlatinib) → diuretics PRN. distinguish from HF with echo / BNP if significant.
CNSLorlatinib CNS effects (cognition, mood, speech, seizures) require separate assessment and severity-based dose modification. Lipid severity is not a validated proxy for CNS toxicity.
FactoidLorlatinib causes severe dyslipidemia (cholesterol ~82%, triglycerides ~61%) — usually needs a interaction-reviewed statin (rosuva/pitava) within weeks of starting.
NEURODose-reduce / delay for G2 neuropathy (limiting instrumental ADL). Hold for G3 (limiting self-care).
VINCABowel regimen for vinca. never give vinca intrathecally (fatal).
FLUIDDocetaxel fluid retention — dexamethasone premedication 8 mg BID × 3 d starting day before. Diurese if symptomatic edema / effusions.
PREMEDSolvent-based paclitaxel requires formulation-specific premedication. Albumin-bound paclitaxel differs. Severe previous reactions require specialist planning, not simply slower infusion.
FactoidPaclitaxel bradycardia (up to ~29%) and 1°-AV block are usually benign — reassure. Reserve telemetry for pre-existing conduction disease. Nab-paclitaxel has lower HSR risk (no Cremophor) but similar neuropathy. No steroid premed needed.
Irinotecan diarrhea — early cholinergic + delayed.
Etoposide secondary AML (11q23). Hypersensitivity.
No HFA-ICOS proformaNo HFA-ICOS proforma. Symptom-driven cardiac review. Main events are infusion-related.
Surveillance
Baseline CBC. Symptom-driven cardiac review.
Slow etoposide infusion. Monitor BP for hypotension.
UGT1A1 status to guide irinotecan dosing.
Management — granular
HYPOEtoposide hypotension → slow / stop infusion. IV fluids. Resume at half rate. Infuse over ≥ 30–60 min.
CHOLIrinotecan early cholinergic symptoms: atropine 0.25–1 mg IV/SC if appropriate. Delayed diarrhea needs the oncology rescue plan, fluid/electrolyte review and prompt escalation for fever, neutropenia or dehydration.
MI/VASPEtoposide rare vasospasm / MI → ACS pathway. Troponin + ECG. Nitrates if vasospasm. D/c if confirmed event.
LYTESIrinotecan diarrhea → Mg / K depletion → QT risk. Replete aggressively. ECG if QTc-prolonging co-therapy.
MYELOGrowth factors / dose-modify for neutropenia. UGT1A1 *28/*28 → reduce irinotecan dose (severe tox). Supportive care for HSR.
FactoidInfuse etoposide over ≥30–60 min to prevent rate-related hypotension. Mitoxantrone — a topo-II agent — is itself directly cardiotoxic (anthracycline-like).
No HFA-ICOS proformaNo HFA-ICOS proforma. The cardiac story is late survivorship vascular risk — lifelong ASCVD prevention (P.14).
Surveillance
Baseline + periodic renal function & electrolytes (Mg, K).
Aggressive hydration ± Mg repletion (cisplatin).
Long-term CV risk-factor surveillance in survivors.
Management — granular
HYDRACisplatin hydration and magnesium replacement depend on dose, regimen, renal function and cardiac reserve. Monitor electrolytes and weight. Avoid a fixed fluid volume in patients with HF.
LYTEReplete Mg / K aggressively — cisplatin Mg wasting can persist months. ECG if QTc concern. Oral Mg supplement long-term.
VTEAnticoagulate VTE (LMWH or DOAC). Cisplatin-based regimens may warrant thromboprophylaxis in high-risk inpatients.
RAYNDCisplatin Raynaud's — nifedipine XL30 mg or amlodipine. Avoid cold. May persist years. Circulating Pt detectable > 20 yr.
SURVSurvivorship: annual lipids / BP / glucose / BMI. Statin per ASCVD risk. Testicular Ca survivors — metabolic syndrome screening lifelong.
SWITCHSwitch to carboplatin (AUC-dosed) if cisplatin nephro- / neuro- / ototoxicity-limited. Lower vascular risk profile.
FactoidCisplatin drives late vascular disease — accelerated atherosclerosis, Raynaud's, thrombosis years on. Circulating platinum is detectable 20 years later. Risk is biphasic.
CVRUse the current ASCVD prevention framework, comorbidities and life expectancy to guide statins. The endocrine agent alone does not determine one universal threshold.
FactoidToxicity flips by agent: tamoxifen → VTE (prothrombotic SERM, also mildly lipid-lowering). aromatase inhibitors → worse lipids and a modest rise in ischemic events.
No HFA-ICOS proformaNo HFA-ICOS proforma. Surveillance is the entire game — risk persists decades. Calcium-score at 10 y.
Surveillance
Consider CAD screening from 5 years after high-risk cardiac radiation exposure, using functional imaging or CCTA according to the clinical question.
Post-RT echo follows exposure, baseline risk and time since therapy. High-risk survivors commonly need 5-yearly reassessment after early follow-up, with prompt imaging for symptoms.
Annual CV review and risk-factor management. Mean-heart/substructure dose and co-exposure inform risk. Radiation dose alone is not an automatic statin prescription.
Management — granular
PREVOptimize BP, lipids, diabetes and tobacco exposure. Prescribe statins for standard CV indications and individual risk, not a universal radiation-dose cutoff.
CAD/VHDTreat CAD/valve disease through a Heart Team. Prior RT increases surgical complexity, but transcatheter versus surgical treatment depends on anatomy, cancer status, durability and procedural risk.
PERICConstrictive pericarditis → pericardiectomy. Restrictive CM → HF care.
MDTMultidisciplinary survivorship clinic. Thyroid function for neck fields.
CASCORECoronary Ca²⁺ score 5–10 yr post-RT. If elevated → CCTA or stress. Repeat q5 yr. HL survivors especially high-yield.
DIBHLeft-breast / mediastinal RT → deep-inspiration breath-hold or prone positioning to ↓ mean heart dose. Proton beam if available.
FactoidDarby et al. found a relative 7.4% increase in major coronary events per Gy mean-heart dose in a historical breast-cancer cohort. Absolute risk depends on baseline risk and modern exposure.
No HFA-ICOS proformaNo HFA-ICOS proforma. Agent-specific — arsenic QT & IL-2 capillary leak need ICU-level vigilance.
Surveillance
Arsenic → label ECG/electrolyte surveillance. More frequent testing for instability.
IL-2 → ICU monitoring. CVP / pressors prepared.
Bleomycin → PFTs / DLCO. Limit cumulative dose.
Management — granular
QTcArsenic: QTc Framingham >450 ms (M) / >460 ms (F) → hold + correct causes. Reduced-dose restart after normalization, per label.
DIFFSuspected differentiation syndrome: dexamethasone 10 mg IV every 12 h and hemodynamic monitoring. Hold ATRA/arsenic for severe disease according to the agent label.
No proforma · low concernLow documented risk is not zero. Use general CV risk (P.1) only if comorbid CVD or symptoms. Some labels require specific cardiac or electrolyte surveillance.
BASEBaseline testing is risk- and agent-specific. Cetuximab carries a cardiopulmonary-arrest warning in selected head-and-neck regimens. Do not classify it as cardiovascularly neutral.
LYTECetuximab: monitor Mg, K and Ca weekly during treatment and for at least 8 weeks after. Correct deficits and assess rhythm risk.
INFUSPremedicate and rate-control first infusions (rituximab / daratumumab). Stop for reaction.
NEWERTreat "no documented toxicity" cautiously for newer agents with short follow-up. Reassess if signals emerge.
NIRAPNiraparib: BP/HR weekly ×2 mo, then monthly ×1 y. CBC weekly ×1 mo, then monthly ×11 mo. Follow label thereafter.
ANEMIAAnemia management depends on symptoms, bleeding, ACS, and cancer intent. Use the relevant transfusion pathway. ESAs have restricted noncurative chemotherapy-associated indications.
FactoidAlmost no oncology drug has a truly zero cardiac signal — "no documented cardiotoxicity" usually means low incidence or short follow-up, not proven safety.
Anthracyclines / HER2 inhibitors usually NOT recommended. Evaluate on case-by-case basis with cardio-onc. If chemo is essential, treat HF first (full GDMT) and reassess EF before any exposure.
Baseline EF40 – 55%
Refer/evaluate and plan with the cancer team. Treat established HF/LV dysfunction for its standard indication. Do not automatically hold therapy or start a prophylactic multidrug bundle solely from this screening band.
Baseline EF> 55%
Use therapy/risk-specific surveillance and treat standard CV indications. At HIGH / V·HIGH risk, specialist-selected neurohormonal or statin prevention may be considered. There is no routine prophylactic bundle.
GLS: calculate the relative decline from baseline
1 · Use absolute magnitudes|−20| = 20 and |−16| = 16
2 · Divide the loss by baseline(20 − 16) ÷ 20 × 100 = 20% relative decline
3 · Interpret with LVEF and symptomsWith LVEF ≥50% and no HF symptoms, a new relative GLS decline >15% meets the imaging criterion for mild asymptomatic CTRCD.
Illustrative values. A 4-point change is a 20% relative decline here. Check image quality, tracking, loading conditions and the same analysis method before attributing the change to therapy. A single low GLS without a baseline cannot establish a relative decline.
M
Management of CTRCD — EF-stratified branch
Symptoms + drug class + LVEF/GLS trajectory
A
LVEF 40–49%
Asymptomatic mod. CTRCD (EF 40–49%)
Differentiateinterrupt anthracyclines for moderate CTRCD. Selected HER2 therapy may continue under ESC guidance, with label/MDT reconciliation.
Workup rule out CAD · hyperthyroidism · anemia.
Consider ACEi/ARB and an evidence-based β-blocker as tolerated, with therapy-specific management and comorbidity review.
Follow Clinical review and TTE/biomarkers at a frequency matched to the therapy, severity and trajectory. Use frequent surveillance if HER2 therapy continues.
Symptomatic on therapy → discuss discontinuation of the involved cancer treatment.
B
LVEF < 40%
Severe asymptomatic CTRCD or HFrEF
Hold the involved cancer treatment per protocol.
Initiate full GDMT ACE/ARB or ARNi · BB · MRA · SGLT2i.
Reassess clinical status and LV function during HF optimization. Agree on the cancer-therapy hold/restart plan and monitoring interval with the MDT.
NYHA I (recovered) discuss resumption of cancer Tx if EF improves (reversibility or partial).
NYHA II–IV (persistent) discuss discontinuation. Bridge with optimized GDMT.
Start the four HFrEF pillars early as tolerated. Do not wait for one drug to reach target. MRA eligibility requires eGFR >30 and K⁺ <5.0 mmol/L, with early and ongoing laboratory monitoring. Stop the MRA if K⁺ cannot be maintained <5.5. Apply SGLT2 inhibitor renal, acute-illness, fasting and surgical precautions. Add hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate for eligible patients with persistent NYHA III–IV HFrEF despite optimal therapy.
Early abnormalities require a comparable baseline. Confirm LVEF, GLS, biomarkers, loading and symptoms. A new abnormality prompts assessment and a therapy-specific plan. It does not automatically justify the same hold or cardioprotective regimen for every drug. Suspected ICI myocarditis follows the urgent pathway in chapters 12–13.
ICI
Highest Risk
WindowDual ICI raises risk. Myocarditis often appears early (median 34 days in the initial registry), but a later presentation remains possible.
Suspect whenNew troponin rise · new arrhythmia / AV block · unexplained dyspnea or fatigue · ptosis or proximal weakness (overlap MG/myositis).
Stat workuphs-Tn · BNP · CK · ECG · TTE immediately. Prompt CMR if stable. EMB when needed for diagnostic uncertainty. Do not delay urgent treatment for either test.
Studies anti-AChR / anti-MuSK antibodies and neurology-directed RNS or SFEMG. Negative antibodies do not exclude ICI-associated MG.
Bedside assess ocular, bulbar, cough and respiratory strength. Obtain serial NIF / FVC with urgent neurology review.
Red flags ptosis · diplopia · dysphagia · weak cough.
Why the overlap matters
ICI can produce concurrent myocardial and skeletal-muscle inflammation and neuromuscular-junction dysfunction. Shared T-cell reactivity is a proposed mechanism, not a complete explanation for every case. Screen all three domains because respiratory or conduction failure may develop despite preserved LVEF.
Rx
Hold ICI, establish severity and treat promptly
1 · Stabilize and investigate
Hold ICI and admit suspected myocarditis for continuous ECG monitoring. Use CICU for shock, serious arrhythmia, high-grade block or respiratory compromise. Normal LVEF or an early negative CMR does not exclude myocarditis.
2 · Start corticosteroids
When myocarditis is considered likely, ESC recommends IV methylprednisolone 500–1000 mg daily for 3–5 days. Do not delay treatment for CMR or biopsy in an unstable patient. Assess troponin, rhythm, ventricular function and symptoms together.
3 · Escalate with specialists
Persistent injury or instability prompts additional immunosuppression. Abatacept/ruxolitinib experience is observational and does not establish one regimen for everyone. Severe MG overlap may require early IVIG/PLEX and airway support. See chapter 13 for response and taper principles.
Biopsy example: lymphocytic myocarditis after pembrolizumab
What to see. A: lymphocytic infiltration on H&E. B: stromal fibrosis on Masson trichrome. C: immunostains characterize the infiltrate, including CD3-positive and CD8-positive T cells.
What the image cannot establish. This is one reported case after pembrolizumab and recent SARS-CoV-2 infection. The authors could not fully exclude viral contribution. Histology supports myocarditis, while drug causation requires the clinical context.
Mechanical support · pacing · airway — bridges, not destinations
Resuscitation and goals of care proceed together
Bridges
Shock
Activate the shock/MCS team. Select temporary support from hemodynamics, ventricular involvement, oxygenation, reversibility and cancer prognosis. LV unloading during VA-ECMO is individualized.
Pacing
High-grade AV block / symptomatic bradycardia → urgent pacing/EP support. Temporary support may allow recovery. permanent pacing timing is individualized, without a fixed 28-day wait.
Vent · 20/30/40
Urgent airway assessment for bulbar weakness, weak cough, fatigue or deteriorating mechanics. FVC <20 mL/kg, NIF weaker than −30 or MEP <40 cm H₂O are warning signs, not standalone intubation rules. Do not wait for hypercapnia.
SCD prev
EP-guided risk assessment. Consider temporary protection selectively. Sustained VT/VF, scar, ventricular recovery and prognosis guide ICD decisions. Completion of immunosuppression is not a universal prerequisite.
Transplant
MCS as bridge to recovery. Heart-transplant eligibility after malignancy depends on tumor type, stage, recurrence risk, and oncology assessment. no universal 3- or 5-year wait.
ICI
R
Response criteria — when to advance, hold, or step back up
Anchored to troponin trajectory
Adequate response @ 72 h
Troponin ↓ > 50% from peak + rhythm / LV stable. If not met → Step 2.
Begin taper
Sustained trop trending normal · BNP stable · LVEF stable / recovered · no arrhythmias · FVC stable.
Pause / re-intensify
Rising Tn/BNP, recurrent symptoms, or falling FVC/LVEF → urgently assess relapse and other causes. Specialist-guided treatment.
Do not rechallenge
Generally avoid after severe myocarditis. Exceptions need MDT review of recovery and cancer benefit.
⏱
Monitoring intensity — match the trajectory
Serial cardiac and respiratory reassessment
Parameter
Inpatient
Outpatient
hs-Tn / CK
Serial troponin to establish trend. CK if myositis. Use the same assay and interpret persistent elevation in context.
Early follow-up during taper, with frequency set by response and relapse risk.
BNP
When clinical course or congestion makes the result useful.
As indicated by symptoms, volume and treatment response.
ECG / telemetry
Continuous.
Weekly early → space as stable.
Echo + GLS
At diagnosis and with clinical change. Repeat before discharge or major treatment decisions as indicated.
Repeat to document recovery or investigate symptoms. Individualize the interval.
CMR (if feasible)
Prompt CMR when feasible. A normal early study does not exclude ICI myocarditis.
Follow-up CMR when it will change care. Imaging alone does not determine ICD eligibility.
FVC · NIF/MIP · MEP
q 4–6h if overlap sx / evolving. Daily if stable on IS.
As clinically indicated.
↓
Taper schedule — begin after sustained improvement
Response-guided, individualized taper
Phase
Prednisone
Other agents
After response
After IV pulse and objective improvement: prednisone/prednisolone 1 mg/kg/day, max 80 mg/day (ESC).
Individualize with oncology/neurology for myositis or MG overlap.
Each reduction
Follow symptoms, ECG/conduction, LV function, troponin, and respiratory strength. Taper more slowly at low doses.
Monitor adrenal suppression and infection risk. The calendar alone does not determine treatment.
Relapse / persistent injury
Pause taper, assess other causes, and discuss escalation with specialists.
MMF, abatacept, ruxolitinib, IVIG, or PLEX selection and withdrawal require an expert plan.
PX
Prophylaxis & supportive care on prolonged IS
Layer per regimen
PJP
PJPTMP-SMX is commonly used when prednisone ≥20 mg/day is expected for ≥4 weeks or combined immunosuppression creates comparable risk. Check renal function, potassium and counts. Alternatives require individual selection, including G6PD testing before dapsone.
HSV / VZV / CMV
HSV / VZV / CMVUse oncology/infectious-disease risk assessment based on serostatus, agents and immune deficit. Pulse steroids alone do not mandate valacyclovir or valganciclovir. CMV prophylaxis or pre-emptive monitoring is regimen-specific.
Fungal
FungalAntifungal prophylaxis is reserved for defined high-risk settings, including expected profound, prolonged neutropenia. MCS alone is not an indication. Review azole interactions and QT effects.
GI
GIAssess ulcer and bleeding risk. Acid suppression is selective, especially with prior ulcer or concurrent antithrombotics, rather than an automatic consequence of steroids.
Bone
Calcium 1000–1200 mg + Vit D 800 IU daily on long-term GCs. Formal bone-health eval if prolonged or pre-existing fracture risk.
Vaccines
No live vaccines on IS. Update inactivated (influenza, pneumococcal, HBV, COVID, recombinant zoster) before / after the IS window.
VTE prophylaxis
VTE preventionAssess thrombosis, bleeding, platelet count and existing therapeutic anticoagulation. Coordinate device anticoagulation with the MCS team rather than adding duplicate prophylaxis.
Goals-of-care
Early palliative-care involvement when oncologic prognosis informs MCS / Tx eligibility. Frame MCS as bridge to recovery, not destination.
Rx
Why these drugs — mechanism · onset · watch-fors
Anchors clinical reasoning
Agent
Methylpred
Broad genomic + non-genomic suppression of all leukocyte lineages — fastest available anti-inflammatory.
WatchRenal injury, volume load, thrombosis, hemolysis and infusion reactions. Review prior immunoglobulin reactions and product-specific precautions.
References
ESC 2022 and ASCO/ESMO irAE guidance inform care. Salem 2023's abatacept/ruxolitinib strategy is observational. It does not establish a universal regimen. Use specialist guidance for infection prevention, respiratory support, and pacing.
PREVENT
2026 Guideline
Goals are backLDL-C targets return (not just % reduction). PREVENT-ASCVD replaces Pooled-Cohort risk. Measure Lp(a) once in adulthood.
Lower for longerEarlier therapy, even in younger adults. 10- & 30-yr risk. CAC, apoB & Lp(a) sharpen who to treat.
Cancer patientsContinue lipid-lowering therapy through cancer treatment unless contraindicated. Defer in pregnancy / lactation.
1
Estimate risk — PREVENT-ASCVD (age 30–79, no ASCVD, LDL 70–189)
10- & 30-year risk
LOW < 3%
Lifestyle (Life's Essential 8). No routine LLT.
BORDERLINE 3–<5%
LLT reasonable after clinician–patient discussion + risk enhancers.
INTERMEDIATE 5–<10%
LLT recommended. CAC may refine. Moderate-intensity statin.
HIGH ≥ 10%
Statin (often high-intensity). Treat to goal below.
2
Treatment goals — LDL-C & non-HDL-C
Lower LDL = lower risk
Borderline / Intermediate
3–<10% · primary prevention
< 100 mg/dL
non-HDL-C < 130. Any CAC → favor statin to this goal.
High
PREVENT-ASCVD ≥10%. Diabetes / CKD have separate risk-based pathways.
Diabetes age 40–75 without ASCVD: at least moderate-intensity statin, usually LDL-C <100. Multiple risk factors can justify a lower goal. Apply separate CKD/HIV recommendations and individualize outside these ages.
Triglycerides address secondary causes and use statins for ASCVD risk. Icosapent ethyl requires eligible risk and TG criteria. Persistent TG ≥500, especially ≥1000 mg/dL, prompts a pancreatitis-prevention plan.
CO
Cardio-oncology specifics
Treat through cancer · mind DDIs
Continue LLT through active cancer treatment unless contraindicated — do not reflexively stop statins (2026 guideline).
Pro-atherogenic Rx VEGF/TKI · nilotinib / ponatinib · ADT · everolimus (mTOR) · lorlatinib · mediastinal RT · ICI (accelerated atherosclerosis) — lower the threshold to start a statin.
CTRCD prevention specialist-selected statin therapy may be considered at HIGH / V·HIGH toxicity risk. Radiation dose alone is not a universal statin indication.
Drug interactions prefer rosuvastatin · pravastatin · pitavastatin (minimal CYP3A4). avoid simvastatin / lovastatin with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors & many oral TKIs.
Defer most LLT during conception, pregnancy & lactation.
One-line plan
Run PREVENT-ASCVD → set the LDL goal → start max-tolerated interaction-reviewed statin → add ezetimibe ± PCSK9 to hit goal → check Lp(a) once → reassess interactions and tolerance during cancer therapy.
4
Statin intolerance (SAMS) — keep patients on therapy
True intolerance is uncommon
1 · Confirm
Check CK · TSH · vitamin-D. Exclude hypothyroidism & CYP3A4 DDIs (azoles · TKIs). Most "intolerance" is not true myositis.
2 · Rechallenge
Stop 2–4 wk → rechallenge same or lower dose, symptom-guided. Try ≥ 2–3 statins before declaring intolerance.
3 · Switch
Rosuvastatin alternate-day or pravastatin / pitavastatin. Fewer CYP3A interactions does not mean interaction-free. Check transporters, renal function and dose limits.
4 · Non-statin
Still off goal / truly intolerant → ezetimibe → bempedoic acid → PCSK9 mAb to reach target.
5
Monitoring & follow-up
Adherence > titration
Lipid panel
Recheck 4–12 wk after start / dose change, then q3–12 mo. Confirm ≥ 50% LDL drop on high-intensity.
Liver
Baseline ALT. Routine repeat testing not required unless symptoms.
Muscle (CK)
Check only if symptomatic. CK ≥ 10× ULN or rhabdomyolysis → stop now.
Glucose
Small ↑ new-onset DM risk — do not stop the statin. Manage glycemia, benefit outweighs.
22%fewer events / 1 mmol/L LDL ↓
Why it pays off — in oncologyStandard ASCVD prevention remains valuable during cancer care. CTT found about 22% relative reduction in major vascular events per 1 mmol/L LDL-C reduction across trial follow-up. This is not a 22% annual reduction or a proven CTRCD-prevention effect.
PREVENT
2025 Guideline
Diagnose & targetHTN at ≥130/80. General treatment goal <130/80, individualized for tolerability, orthostasis, frailty and goals of care.
Risk-based with PREVENTPREVENT replaces pooled-cohort risk. Stage 1 → drug if ASCVD · DM · CKD or 10-yr risk ≥7.5%.
Cancer patientsContinue BP therapy through treatment. VEGF / TKI HTN is the commonest cardio-onc HTN — treat and continue.
VEGF / TKI HTN monitor home BP daily in the first cycle and after dose increases, then every 2–3 weeks. The goal and treatment plan depend on prognosis, tolerability and the exact agent.
Severe HTN if SBP ≥180 or DBP ≥110 mmHg, hold the causative cancer therapy while urgently assessing and treating BP. Acute organ injury is an emergency. Resume only after control and oncology review.
Screen aldosterone-to-renin ratio (↑aldo + suppressed renin). Correct K⁺, don't salt-restrict, stop MRA 4–6 wk first. Confirm saline / Na-load, then subtype CT + AVS. Screen resistant HTN or suggestive features. Screening may also be considered in stage 2 HTN.
Renovascular
Renal duplex · CTA / MRA. Clues: bruit, flash pulmonary edema, Cr ↑ >30% on ACEi/ARB, young woman (FMD).
7 days (min 3) before each visit. discard day 1, average the rest.
Interpret
Average ≥ 130/80 = HTN (office 130 ↔ home 130. Office 140 ↔ home 135/85).
20%fewer CV events / 10 mmHg SBP ↓
Why it pays off — in oncologyTreat hypertension for its established cardiovascular benefits. Choose a tolerable goal, check interacting drugs and monitor for hypotension when a VEGF inhibitor stops. Do not extrapolate a fixed trial risk reduction to every patient with active cancer.
Before conditioningHistory and exam, ECG, BP and baseline cardiac imaging. Review prior cardiotoxic exposures and conditioning regimen. Biomarkers and additional testing depend on risk and planned serial use.
After transplantRisk-based follow-up. High-risk survivors need early reassessment and a long-term plan. New dyspnea, edema, chest pain or arrhythmia warrants prompt testing.
Amyloid screen
Suspected AL amyloidosisSerum free light chains plus serum and urine immunofixation, cardiac imaging and hematology review. CMR characterizes involvement but cannot type amyloid. Tissue confirmation/typing may be needed.
Echo & biomarker standardsUse measured LVEF, preferably 3-D when feasible, and comparable GLS acquisition. Use ultrasound enhancement when endocardial definition is inadequate. CMR adjudicates uncertain imaging. BNP or NT-proBNP is acceptable. Keep assay and modality consistent.
Strong CYP3A inhibitors can raise exposure to ibrutinib, ribociclib and many TKIs. The effect is drug-specific. Abiraterone does not share this simple rule.
Avoid strong inhibitors. If unavoidable, dose-reduce per label. ECG + electrolytes. Choose an interaction-sparing antimicrobial.
Treat HTN with a DHP-CCB (amlodipine). ACEi/ARB first-line.
Simvastatin / lovastatin + CYP3A4 inhibitor / TKI
↑ statin levels → myopathy / rhabdomyolysis.
Consider pravastatin, rosuvastatin or pitavastatin after a full interaction check. Transporter interactions still matter, including darolutamide–rosuvastatin.
Enzalutamide and apalutamide have different transporter effects. Strong CYP induction may reduce apixaban/rivaroxaban exposure. Apalutamide also induces P-gp.
Review CYP3A and P-gp effects for the exact combination. Dabigatran/edoxaban are not automatically safe substitutes. Consider LMWH or another anticoagulant with oncology/pharmacy input.
Anthracycline + trastuzumab (concurrent)
Additive cardiotoxicity → higher CTRCD risk.
Sequence when oncologically appropriate. Follow drug-specific echo surveillance. At HIGH / V·HIGH risk, use cardio-onc review for any specialist-selected prevention.
S
Cancer-survivor evaluation
Annual review · risk-based echo
2026 IC-OS/MASCC minimum-care layer for adults treated for adult-onset cancer: after cancer therapy, review symptoms and CV risk factors annually and re-stratify CTR-CVT risk at 5 years. Obtain a 12-month echo after HER2-targeted therapy or, for early-stage cancer treated with curative intent, cumulative doxorubicin ≥250 mg/m² (or equivalent). In asymptomatic survivors, q5y echo may be considered for MODERATE risk (IIb-C). HIGH / V·HIGH risk: years 1, 3, and 5, then q5y (IIa-C). Imaging-frequency evidence is limited. Childhood-cancer survivors follow their separate exposure-based pathway, and new symptoms trigger referral at any time.
Annual symptoms + CV risk factors. Echo at 12 mo if early-stage/curative intent and cumulative doxorubicin ≥250 mg/m². Thereafter use post-Tx risk tier.
Annual symptoms + CV risk factors. echo at 12 mo post-Tx, then symptoms and post-Tx risk tier guide longer surveillance.
Above + BNP. Repeat echo. CMR if persistent LV dysfunction. resume / continue GDMT if EF not fully recovered.
ADT / hormonal
ASCVD risk. BP · lipids · A1c · weight q6–12 mo. DEXA. Lifestyle + statin by risk.
Above + stress test / CTA per CAD suspicion. Optimize metabolic syndrome. Cardiology if MACE.
Why lifelong: in 5-year childhood-cancer survivors the 30-year cumulative incidence of symptomatic cardiac events (CHF the most common) reached 7.3% after anthracyclines and 12.6% (~1 in 8) after anthracyclines + chest RT — risk climbs exponentially with cumulative dose, so surveillance never fully stops.
Nursing monitoring protocol
VEGF / TKI · BPHome BP daily in cycle 1 and after dose increases, then every 2–3 weeks. Escalate severe BP or symptoms promptly.
Anthracycline / HER2 Ask weight, dyspnea, edema, orthopnea each cycle. Echo per schedule. Call if new HF symptoms.
ICI · myocarditisUse the agreed risk-based ECG/troponin plan. New symptoms, ECG changes or troponin rise require urgent assessment.
QT agents Pre-dose ECG + K⁺ / Mg²⁺. Keep K⁺ ≥4.0, Mg²⁺ ≥2.0. Call if QTc ≥500 or the agent-specific threshold is reached, or for syncope.
WORKUP
Same symptoms, shifted differential
Cancer patients present like everyone else—but therapy reshapes the odds. For every workup ask: which target/pathway, which agent and combinations, what cumulative exposure, and how long since the last cycle? Class effects predict the common toxicity. Agent pharmacology, prior radiation, and host reserve explain the exception. Pair the evaluation with the drug-class card and HFA-ICOS tier. Keep a low threshold for ECG + troponin + echo.
Pulmonary suspected pneumonitis/ILD → CT chest and urgent oncology/pulmonary review. Exclude infection and PE. Holding therapy and corticosteroids depend on the agent and grade. T-DXd ILD has specific permanent-stop rules.
PALP
Palpitations
Capture the rhythm
First pass 12-lead ECG during symptoms · K⁺ / Mg²⁺ · TSH · echo.
Atrial fibrillation ibrutinib · alkylators / SCT · ICI · melphalan → rate control (BB. Non-DHP CCB mind DDIs). Use CHA₂DS₂-VASc as an input, then add active cancer, thrombocytopenia/coagulopathy, intracranial disease, interactions, procedures, prognosis, and goals. Cancer neither erases the score nor lets it decide alone. Avoid warfarin with ibrutinib.
Early HF / CTRCD subclinical EF / GLS decline (anthracycline · HER2 · VEGF) → echo + GLS, biomarkers.
Anemia investigate severity and cause. Transfusion and ESA decisions depend on symptoms, treatment intent and oncology guidance. ESAs carry thrombotic risk.
Other deconditioning · cachexia → cardiac rehab after ruling out the above.
When to escalate now
Syncope with exertion or documented arrhythmia · new HF with hypotension · suspected tamponade · sustained VT or QTc ≥ 500 ms · massive PE → admit, telemetry, urgent cardiology. Suspected ICI myocarditis at any presentation → treat as emergency (P.12).
WORKUP
Cancer patients come to surgery often
Resection · access · biopsy — carrying cardiotoxic exposure, hypercoagulability & deconditioning. Co-manage with oncology · anesthesia · surgery, and don't reflexively stop cardiac meds. For every case ask: which drug, what cumulative dose, how long since the last cycle?
1
Who to refer & what to assess
RCRI · METs / DASI · biomarkers
REFER
Refer to cardio-onc if
Higher peri-op CV risk
Exposure active / recent cardiotoxic Tx · prior CTRCD · mediastinal RT · HFA-ICOS high / V-high.
Cardiac ECG and biomarkers according to surgical/patient risk. Echo for new symptoms, suspected ventricular dysfunction or significant valve disease. Do not order echo or stress testing solely because cancer is present.
Heme platelets · anticoagulation status. Cancer hypercoagulability & bleeding risk.
Oral options apixaban or rivaroxaban may be offered to selected patients after initial LMWH/UFH. ASCO rates this a weak recommendation. PROLAPS II tested rivaroxaban against placebo after the first postoperative week, not non-inferiority to LMWH.
Bleeding check hold if active bleed / drain output high. Resume once surgical hemostasis stable.
Selection review bleeding, renal function, drug interactions, absorption and adherence. Do not generalize trial safety to every resection.
5
Peri-op risk scores — quick reference
RCRI · DASI · METs · surgery risk
Tool
Components
Interpretation
RCRI
High-risk surgery · IHD · HF · CVA/TIA · DM on insulin · Cr >2 mg/dL
Use a validated perioperative calculator with its stated endpoint and population. The same RCRI score does not imply one universal event probability.
Cancer resection = usually intermediate or high. Combine with RCRI + function
Cancer therapy may reduce functional capacity through fatigue, anemia and deconditioning. Evaluate reversible causes and use prehabilitation when feasible. Treat anemia by cause and clinical context, without a universal Hb 10 g/dL intervention threshold.
REF
H
Hold / Stop & Resume criteria — by therapy class
Check the exact label · no universal restart threshold
Therapy class
When to HOLD / STOP
Immediate management
When to RESUME (or switch)
Tests before resumption
Post-resumption surveillance
AnthracyclinesDox · Epi · Idarubicin
Interrupt for moderate/severe asymptomatic CTRCD or clinically important HF. Isolated Tn/GLS change needs assessment.
HF therapy. Exclude other causes. Assess dexrazoxane/liposomal options.
MDT after recovery and benefit-risk review. No universal EF/4-week rule.
TTE/GLS, Tn/NP. Lifetime exposure.
Close monitoring, often each 1–2 cycles after restart. Risk-based survivorship.
HER2 therapiesTrastuzumab · ADCs
Interrupt for EF <40% or moderate/severe symptomatic CTRCD. Reconcile exact label.
HF therapy and MDT. Asymptomatic EF 40–49% may continue with protection/monitoring.
ESC: asymptomatic, EF ≥40% (ideally ≥50%). Individual labels differ.
TTE/GLS, Tn/NP.
TTE/biomarkers every 2 cycles initially after restart, then risk-based.
VEGF / multi-TKIsSunitinib · Lenvatinib
Severe/uncontrolled HTN, important CTRCD, vascular toxicity or QT per label.
≥180 systolic or ≥110 diastolic: hold. Treat BP and evaluate organ injury.
BP <160/100 after severe HTN per ESC, plus stricter product recovery rules.
BP log. Renal/electrolytes. ECG/TTE by phenotype.
Home BP and agent/risk-specific ECG, renal, and LV surveillance.
Anti-VEGF mAbBevacizumab
Hold severe HTN uncontrolled medically. Discontinue crisis/encephalopathy, severe ATE or grade 4 VTE.
MDT may restart, reduce or switch after control. AF alone is not an automatic permanent stop.
ECG, BP. Thrombotic/bleeding risk.
Pulse/BP and bleeding assessment each visit.
Proteasome inhibitorsCarfilzomib
Significant HF or CV toxicity: hold per label. BNP rise alone needs context.
Assess congestion, BP, renal function and other causes. Treat HF.
Consider lower-dose restart after recovery and MDT benefit-risk assessment.
TTE/NP as indicated. BP and volume.
BP/volume and risk-directed cardiac testing.
Hormonal — prostateAbiraterone · ADT
Severe HTN, hypokalemia, fluid retention or HF: assess and hold as indicated.
Correct K/BP/volume. Verify steroid pairing and interactions.
Label and oncology plan after control. ADT selection individualized.
K, BP, liver tests and volume status.
Abiraterone: BP/K/fluid retention at least monthly.
mTOR inhibitorsEverolimus
Significant pneumonitis, infection, metabolic or vascular toxicity per label.
Identify cause. Drug hold/steroids depend on severity and diagnosis.
Recovery and dose-modification rules are product-specific.
Pulmonary evaluation, BP, lipids/glucose, renal and counts.
Periodic metabolic/organ surveillance by label and risk.
EVIDENCE
E
Recommendation class is not a patient risk score
ESC 2022 · interpretation
IRecommended. Expected benefit supports the action in the stated population.
IIaShould be considered. Evidence or opinion favors usefulness.
IIbMay be considered. Usefulness is less well established.
IIINot recommended. No benefit or potential harm in the specified setting.
Evidence levelA: multiple randomized trials/meta-analyses. B: a randomized trial or large non-randomized studies. C: consensus, small studies or registries. A strong recommendation can rest on limited trial data. Neither risk-factor stacking nor clinician confidence changes the published class.
1
Identify which kind of statement you are reading
Source
What it answers
How to apply it
Regulatory label
Approved indication, formulation, dose modifications, monitoring and permanent-stop criteria.
Check the exact agent and cancer setting. A class summary cannot replace a product label.
Society guideline
A recommendation for a defined clinical population.
Retain its year, population, class and evidence level. Read exceptions and contraindications.
Clinical practice statement
Consensus implementation where evidence is evolving.
Distinguish a proposed minimum-care approach from a trial-proven optimum.
Randomized trial
A comparison in enrolled patients using specified outcomes.
Check absolute risk, endpoint and follow-up. LVEF preservation does not establish a survival benefit.
Observational study
Association, feasibility or a safety signal.
Consider confounding, selection and surveillance bias. Association is not proof that intervention changes outcomes.
Example schedule
One way a program may operationalize monitoring.
Adapt to actual drug, risk, symptoms and available care. It is not a universal mandate.
2
Three decisions where the distinction changes care
HER2 therapy
Selected asymptomatic patients with LVEF 40–49% may continue under a cardio-oncology plan. This does not erase the different hold/resume rules for trastuzumab, T-DM1 and T-DXd.
ICI myocarditis
Urgent treatment follows clinical suspicion and severity. Abatacept/ruxolitinib experience is promising but largely observational. It is not a fixed rescue regimen for every patient.
Primary prevention
Treat established CV indications. Selective high-risk prevention is different from routinely prescribing a multi-drug cardioprotective bundle to every patient.
Primary sourcesESC cardio-oncology 2022, HFA-ICOS baseline assessment 2020, IC-OS/MASCC 2026 and current product labels. The drug cards and hold/resume matrix preserve the clinical context for their use.
EVIDENCE
II
Selective care requires a reason and a reassessment plan
Guideline options · individualized decisions
Class II does not become Class I by accumulation. Multiple risks may strengthen the case for an intervention, but do not change its published recommendation class. Document the expected benefit, competing harms and patient preference.
Decision
Reason to consider
Guardrail
ACEi/ARB, beta-blocker or statin before exposure
ESC 2022 offers selective prevention in high/very-high toxicity risk.
Not a routine bundle. Standard hypertension, ASCVD and HF indications remain separate. Review hypotension, renal function and interactions.
Dexrazoxane / liposomal anthracycline
Necessary anthracycline treatment with substantial cardiac vulnerability.
Match cancer efficacy, cumulative exposure and regulatory indication. A single 250 mg/m² threshold does not define every eligible or ineligible patient.
New isolated GLS or troponin change
A reproducible signal may precede LVEF decline.
Check loading, rhythm, assay, image quality and other causes. Do not use an invented absolute GLS cutoff or automatically stop cancer treatment.
CMR / biopsy
Uncertain ventricular function, tissue disease or unresolved suspected myocarditis.
Ask what diagnostic uncertainty the test resolves. Do not delay urgent treatment in an unstable patient.
After radiation
Exposure-informed surveillance and conventional CV prevention.
Use field, mean-heart/substructure dose, time and symptoms. No universal radiation dose mandates statin, aspirin or coronary CT.
ADT choice
Cardiovascular history can inform agonist versus antagonist discussion.
Trial populations and endpoints differ. Do not promise a cardiovascular advantage for every patient.
SGLT2 inhibitor
Established HF, diabetes or CKD indication.
Do not label primary CTRCD prophylaxis an ESC 2022 Class II recommendation. Evaluate the current indication and safety.
Rehabilitation / exercise
Functional limitation, deconditioning and eligible cardiac disease.
Prescribe to symptoms and safety. Cancer exposure alone does not establish payer eligibility for cardiac rehabilitation.
?
Before ordering, answer four questions
1 · What problem is being prevented?
Distinguish HF, an imaging change, a vascular event and treatment interruption. Benefits for one endpoint do not prove benefits for the others.
2 · Does this patient resemble the evidence?
Check age, cancer stage, drug, cumulative dose, baseline function and prior therapy. A lymphoma statin trial is not a universal cancer prevention protocol.
3 · What can the intervention harm?
Assess BP, renal function, electrolytes, thrombocytopenia, interactions and treatment burden. Avoid aspirin solely for TKI exposure without an established indication or a specific specialist plan.
4 · How will the plan be reassessed?
Name the symptom, laboratory or imaging trigger, the clinician responsible and the timing. New toxicity changes the risk assessment.
Keep the treatment goal explicitPreserve effective cancer care while managing cardiovascular risk. A palliative treatment goal does not automatically exclude useful cardiovascular therapy, and curative intent does not make every optional intervention mandatory.
PEARLS
Reframe the field
BidirectionalCancer therapy → CV disease, and CV disease → cancer (shared biology & risk factors). Not "reverse" — bidirectional.
Beyond a low EFCardiotoxicity is much broader than HFrEF — HFpEF, vascular, metabolic, arrhythmic, pulmonary-vascular.
Permissive cardiotoxicityThe immediate threat is the cancer — don't reflexively stop life-saving therapy for mild LV dysfunction.
1
Bidirectional cardio-oncology
shared biology, not one-way
→
Therapy → CV disease
the classic axis
Direct toxicity anthracyclines, HER2, VEGF, ICI, RT — across the CV spectrum.
Aging survivors >18 M US survivors. Metastatic disease is now chronic → years of cumulative exposure.
←
CV disease → cancer
reverse axis
Association CV disease and cancer share exposures and biological pathways. Observed associations do not establish that one disease directly causes the other in an individual patient.
HF and cancer cohort estimates vary with age, smoking, comorbidity and surveillance. Interpret relative risk alongside the population and absolute incidence.
HFpEFTreatment-related HF can occur with preserved EF. Symptomatic CTRCD includes a confirmed HF syndrome. Investigate filling pressure, valves, pericardium and alternative causes.
Dose-dependent risk rises sharply > 250 mg/m², but there is no truly safe dose.
Mechanism topoisomerase-2β, ROS, iron handling, titin → systolic and diastolic (HFpEF) injury.
Prognosis cardiotoxicity can complicate cancer care. An association with worse survival does not prove that prevention restores a fixed amount of survival.
↔
Permissive cardiotoxicity
HER2 & beyond
HER2 EF decline common (3–33%, highest after anthracycline), usually reversible.
Don't reflexively stop life-saving therapy for mild LV dysfunction → start neurohormonal Rx, monitor closely, continue cancer therapy.
Small prospective studies SAFE-HEaRt: 27/30 evaluable patients completed planned HER2 therapy. SCHOLAR: 18/20 completed trastuzumab, but 2/20 developed clinically important HF. Both used specialist follow-up and HF therapy.
4
Why the field matters
a growing, aging, exposed population
Survivors
Cancer survivors may live for decades after treatment. Exposure history and competing risks shape long-term CV care.
Competing mortality
CV disease is a leading cause of non-cancer death in survivors.
Metastatic = chronic
prolonged survival on serial cardiotoxic regimens → cumulative risk.
Risk varies
by cancer & therapy — AF with targeted agents, IHD in lung cancer, HF with anthracyclines.
Association is not treatment effectAAML0531 linked cardiotoxicity with worse pediatric AML outcomes. It did not randomize cardioprotection or show that avoiding cardiotoxicity recovers a 20% survival benefit.
5
Clonal hematopoiesis — the biological bridge
CHIP / CCUS · shared biology · emerging target
CH
What it is
somatic mutations in blood
CHIP somatic mutations (DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1, TP53, JAK2) in hematopoietic cells at VAF ≥2% without cytopenias or hematologic malignancy.
Prevalence10–20% of adults >70 y. Rises with age, smoking, prior chemo / RT.
CV link CHIP is associated with vascular risk, with important variation by gene and clone size. These associations do not yet define a routine cardio-oncology screening or treatment pathway.
CO
Cardio-onc relevance
why it matters here
Cancer Tx → CHIP cytotoxic chemo (alkylators, platinums) and RT select for pre-existing clones (esp. TP53, PPM1D) — cancer treatment accelerates CHIP.
Progression risk depends on mutation, clone size, cytopenias and other features. Avoid applying a single annual transformation rate to every clone.
Double hit CHIP patients who receive anthracyclines may face compounded CV + hematologic risk — an emerging reason to integrate hematology and cardiology surveillance.
6
Key terminology — precision in language
what the terms actually mean
CTRCD
CTRCDSymptomatic: a confirmed HF syndrome. Asymptomatic: severe LVEF <40%, moderate LVEF 40–49% with the specified EF/GLS/biomarker changes, or mild LVEF ≥50% with new relative GLS reduction >15% and/or biomarker rise. Use the complete severity definition.
Reversibility
RecoveryDescribe symptoms, LVEF, GLS and biomarkers over time. EF normalization does not guarantee complete myocardial recovery. Avoid an unsupported universal 5-point/12-month irreversibility rule.
Cardioprotection
Primary = before exposure. CV drugs are not a routine bundle, though specialist-selected neurohormonal/statin therapy may be considered at HIGH / V·HIGH risk. Secondary follows detected injury.
PEARLS
1
Radiation heart disease
no threshold dose
Gy
The dose-response
Darby, NEJM 2013
+7.4% / Gy major coronary events per Gy mean heart dose, no threshold. Begins <5 yr, persists >20 yr.
Modern era mean heart dose is far lower (~1–2 Gy vs ~4.9 historically)—but historical mantle-field risk does not transport directly to modern conformal therapy.
Read the plan record field and era, mean-heart dose, and relevant substructure dose. Late disease follows beam geometry and tissue dose—not a generic “chest radiation” label. LV dose informs HF risk and pulmonary-vein dose may inform AF risk.
Manage control conventional risk factors. Statins follow ASCVD/risk indications. Select CAD screening by exposure and clinical risk, rather than treating all prior radiation identically.
Late, additive often a "second hit" decades later — keep it on the survivorship problem list.
2
Monitoring — what actually predicts
change > baseline
Anthracycline echo
baseline. At 12 mo post-Tx if early-stage/curative intent and cumulative doxorubicin ≥250 mg/m². Then risk-based (limited evidence).
GLS
the change (not baseline) predicts subsequent EF decline. Clinical actionability still evolving.
Biomarkers
not a universal baseline bundle. Consider hs-Tn/BNP at HIGH / V·HIGH risk, then interpret trends in clinical context.
Serial imaging is a measurement contract. Keep modality, acquisition, loading, rhythm, vendor/software, and analysis constant. Prefer 3-D EF when feasible, and ask whether change exceeds repeatability. GLS change is prognostic, but SUCCOUR did not prove that every GLS-guided strategy improves outcomes. “Late toxicity” is usually a second hit. Anthracycline EF decline is often detectable early. Later presentations commonly acquire a trigger such as HTN, AF, or coronary disease.
3
Prevention — risk-guided, then go hard on risk factors
intensive RF modification is the lever
Cp
Cardioprotection
not one-size-fits-all
Not routine ACEi/ARB, β-blocker, statin, or SGLT2i solely for primary CTR-CVT prophylaxis. Treat standard CV indications. Specialist-selected neurohormonal/statin therapy may be considered at HIGH / V·HIGH risk.
Enalapril Cardinale 2006: LVEF decline 43% control vs 0% enalapril (P <0.001) in troponin-positive patients after high-dose chemotherapy (114 randomized).
HER2 cardioprot. Guglin 2019: in the anthracycline-pretreated subgroup, cardiotoxicity-free survival longer on carvedilol (P = 0.009) and lisinopril (P = 0.015) vs placebo (overall cohort NS).
STOP-CA lymphoma patients: LVEF decline ≥10 points to <55% at 12 months occurred in 13/150 (9%) on atorvastatin and 33/150 (22%) on placebo. HF events did not differ significantly. Generalizability is limited.
PRADA II sacubitril/valsartan did not significantly improve the primary LVEF endpoint in early breast cancer. Secondary imaging/biomarker signals require separate interpretation.
RF
Intensive risk-factor control
the biggest win
Blood pressure use evidence-based treatment with individual tolerability. Do not assume general-population intensive-BP trial results apply unchanged during active cancer.
VEGF-TKI HTN rises in the first week → treat & continue the drug.
Opportunistic CAC use calcium on oncology CT to inform ASCVD discussion and treatment. Integrate burden, age, competing illness and patient preference.
4
Drug-specific prevention
tailor to the agent
ADT (prostate)
metabolic syndrome — treat BP, lipids, glucose. Statin. CV risk burden is high & undertreated.
VEGF / TKI
VEGF / TKIHome BP daily in cycle 1 and after dose increases, then every 2–3 weeks. Severe HTN needs a treatment hold and coordinated care.
Anthracycline
baseline echo. Minimize cumulative dose. Use cardio-onc review for any specialist-selected prevention at HIGH / V·HIGH risk—no routine CV-drug bundle.
Disparities assess medication cost, transport, access to BP devices and reliable follow-up. Do not attribute one fixed proportion of racial disparities to a single pathway without a specific study and population.
Environment air pollution (PM2.5, ozone) associates with systolic dysfunction. Neighborhood walkability with lower HTN / diabetes / obesity.
The role a cancer diagnosis is not a reason to under-treat CV disease — manage it intensively so the patient can complete the life-saving cancer therapy & avoid an interrupting CV event.
6
Exercise & cardiac rehabilitation in cancer
underused, evidence-based, safe
Rx
Why exercise matters
during & after treatment
Exercise improves fitness, function and fatigue in selected cancer populations. Prevention of clinical anthracycline HF remains unproven.
Mortality physical activity is associated with better survival in observational studies. Magnitude varies by cancer and study design. Do not promise a universal mortality reduction.
Function combats cancer-related fatigue (the #1 patient complaint), deconditioning, sarcopenia from ADT / steroids.
Mental health reduces depression & anxiety. Improves QoL scores across cancer types.
Rehabilitation refer to oncology exercise or cardiac rehabilitation when clinically appropriate. Standard cardiac diagnoses and payer rules determine covered cardiac rehabilitation.
Prehab 2–4 wk structured exercise before major surgery ↓ LOS & complications.
Safety exercise is safe during chemo/RT with appropriate screening. avoid high-intensity if active myocarditis, unstable arrhythmia, or symptomatic HF.
Shared treatment goalSupport effective cancer treatment through timely CV care. The oncologic consequence of a hold depends on regimen, setting, duration and alternatives. Some treatment interruptions are necessary to prevent serious harm.
REF
D
Disease-group cardio-onc workup matrix
Expanded reference · cross-ref P.3–10 drug cards
How to use this pageMatch the disease group to the actual agents, dose, stage and treatment intent. These prompts do not replace current labels or the individualized surveillance plan. New symptoms take priority over a routine interval.
Disease
Cardiotoxic regimens
CV signals
Assessment prompts
Clinical pearls
Escalate to cardio-onc
BreastHER2+ · HR+ · TNBC
AC-T (doxo + cyclo → taxane)
Trastuzumab ± pertuzumab × 1 yr
T-DM1 / T-DXd (ADC)
Ribociclib / palbociclib (CDK4/6)
Tamoxifen · AI. Left chest RT
CTRCD risk rises with prior anthracycline exposure. The magnitude depends on regimen and host risk.
QTc ↑ (ribociclib)
VTE (tamoxifen)
Late CAD / valve (RT)
Echo + GLS q3 mo on HER2 Rx
Troponin/NP surveillance by anthracycline risk and treatment plan
ECG d1 + d14 with ribociclib (QTc)
BNP if dyspnea / edema
Baseline ASCVD risk + lipids if RT planned
Anthra → HER2 is sequential insult: GLS often drops before EF
Trastuzumab cardiotoxicity is usually reversible — don't abandon too early
Left breast RT + IMN fields = highest cardiac dose
CDK4/6: ribociclib QTc >> palbociclib / abema
GLS ↓ > 15% relative on HER2
EF ↓ ≥ 10 pt or < 50%
Tn rise post-anthracycline
Ribociclib: QTcF >480 ms or symptoms, using label rules
GI / PancreaticCRC · Gastric · HCC
5-FU / capecitabine (FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, CapeOx)
Bevacizumab. Ramucirumab
Oxaliplatin. Irinotecan
Regorafenib (TKI). Lenvatinib (HCC)
Coronary vasospasm (5-FU — can mimic STEMI)
HTN (anti-VEGF)
ATE (bevacizumab)
HF (regorafenib / lenvatinib)
CAD evaluation for symptoms or selected high-risk patients
BP every cycle on anti-VEGF
Chest-pain action plan for fluoropyrimidines. Antianginal prophylaxis is individualized.
Bevacizumab: serial urine protein. Dipstick ≥2+ prompts quantitative assessment.
Echo baseline if HCC TKI
Fluoropyrimidine ischemia may coexist with obstructive CAD. Evaluate ACS rather than presuming a normal angiogram.
After toxicity, discuss alternatives or monitored rechallenge with oncology/cardiology. No single substitute fits every cancer or country.
Capecitabine can also cause ischemia/vasospasm. Risks are not identical across schedules.
Chest pain / ST Δ on 5-FU
SBP ≥ 180 on anti-VEGF
ATE event
New proteinuria ≥ 2+
GUProstate · RCC · Testicular
ADT (GnRH ± AR inhibitors: enza, apa, daro, abi)
VEGF-TKIs (cabo, suni, lenva — RCC)
ICI (pembro, nivo). Platinum (testicular)
mTOR (everolimus)
Metabolic syndrome (ADT — ↑ weight, lipids, A1c)
HTN (TKI / abi)
MACE ↑ (ADT long-term)
LV dysfunction (TKI). hypoK⁺ (abi)
ASCVD risk calc at ADT initiation
BP / lipids / A1c q3–6 mo
Echo if HFA-ICOS ≥ high or TKI start
Vascular exam and symptom-directed testing for the actual GU regimen
K⁺ monitoring (abiraterone)
ADT accelerates atherosclerosis — treat lipids + BP aggressively
GnRH antagonists (degarelix, relugolix) may have lower MACE vs agonists
Lifelong vascular risk review after cisplatin. Use standard risk-based prevention.
New MACE event on ADT
BP uncontrolled on 3 agents
EF drop on VEGF-TKI
Metabolic syndrome worsening
Thoracic / H&NNSCLC · SCLC · H&N SCC
ICI (pembro, nivo, atezo, durva)
Platinum doublets (carbo-pem, cis-gem)
Osimertinib (EGFR). Alectinib / lorlatinib (ALK)
Chest RT (definitive or concurrent)
ICI myocarditis — highest risk with combo ICI
QTc ↑ (osimertinib, crizotinib)
Bradycardia (crizotinib, lorlatinib)
Late CAD / valve / pericardial (RT)
Baseline ECG + hs-Tn before ICI
ICI ECG/troponin monitoring by risk and the agreed schedule
ECG for QTc on EGFR TKIs
HR monitoring on ALK TKIs
Long-term CAD screening post-RT
ICI myocarditis: median onset 30 d — most cases in first 3 cycles
Combo ICI (nivo + ipi) = highest myocarditis risk
Osimertinib: HF signal in FLAURA — monitor if pre-existing CV disease
Concurrent CRT: pericarditis may mimic progression
BRAF/MEK dysfunction may improve. Hold the responsible agent(s) according to their separate labels.
Sarcoma anthracycline doses can reach very high cumulative levels
Any Tn rise on combo ICI
BRAF/MEK: symptoms or label-defined EF decline, including the lower limit of normal
Approaching doxo 400 mg/m²
Neuro-OncGBM · CNS mets
Temozolomide + RT
Bevacizumab
Lomustine (CCNU)
HTN (bevacizumab)
ATE / proteinuria (bevacizumab)
Rare LV dysfunction
BP each cycle
Baseline echo on bevacizumab
UPCR if proteinuria develops
Generally lower CV burden than other disease groups
Bevacizumab in neuro-onc: HTN management is main cardio-onc role
Refractory HTN on bev
Proteinuria ≥ 2+
Benign Hem / Sickle CellSCD · Thalassemia
Hydroxyurea
Chronic transfusion (iron overload)
Hydroxyurea and hematology-directed transfusion or disease-modifying treatment. Voxelotor was withdrawn in 2024.
Iron chelation (deferasirox, deferoxamine)
Iron-overload cardiomyopathy
Pulmonary HTN (SCD)
Diastolic HF
Stroke risk (SCD)
SCD: diagnostic echo for symptoms/signs. Routine screening echo is not advised in asymptomatic patients.
Iron assessment depends on transfusion burden and disease. Cardiac T2* is selected for suspected cardiac iron.
BNP. Ferritin q3 mo
TCD for stroke screening (peds)
T2* < 20 ms = iron overload. < 10 ms = severe → intensify chelation
SCD: isolated TRJV 2.5–2.9 m/s does not automatically require RHC. Integrate symptoms, repeat echo, NT-proBNP and exercise capacity with PH expertise.
Chelation can reverse iron cardiomyopathy if caught before EF drops
T2* < 10 ms
Elevated TRJV with symptoms or other evidence of PH
New HF symptoms
EF decline on echo
Baseline assessmentBefore potentially cardiotoxic therapy, document CV history and conventional risk factors. Use a validated therapy-specific HFA-ICOS proforma where applicable. The disease label alone does not determine risk or surveillance.
Rx
R
Representative cancer therapies — identify the CV exposure
For the cardiologist — what your patient is receiving
Why this page existsUse these examples to recognize cardiovascular exposures, not to select an oncology regimen. Stage, biomarkers, prior therapy, approvals and treatment intent determine sequencing. This table is not exhaustive and does not rank current first-line options.
Page numbers after each agent (→ P.3, P.5, etc.) point to the drug-class card with full toxicity profile, HFA-ICOS scoring, and management. CV = significant cardiotoxicity. LO = lower risk but monitor.
Rx
A
Common regimen acronyms — what your patient is actually getting
Shorthand decoded · CV = cardiotoxic
Why this page exists
When a patient's chart says "on R-CHOP" or "completed KEYNOTE-522," a cardiologist needs to know which drugs are inside that acronym — and which ones are cardiotoxic. The bolded letter in each component maps to the acronym. Cross-reference with P.3–10 drug cards for management.
CV Pembrolizumab + carboplatin/paclitaxel, then anthracycline + cyclophosphamide, followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab after surgery. Original trial AC/EC was every 3 weeks. Dose-dense variants are modified regimens.