START · RISK · LIPIDS · BP · CKM · PEOPLE · ONCOLOGY · ASCVD · FOLLOW-UP · EVIDENCE
Prevention is a closed-loop treatment plan. Identify the phenotype → use the correct risk estimate → personalize → set numeric targets → prescribe enough therapy → date the monitoring plan. A calculator informs a decision; it never cancels a direct indication.
1

Sort first: the score is decision-specific

do not use one bypass bucket
DecisionScore not needed when…Action
Secondary preventionClinical atherosclerotic ASCVD: MI/ACS, coronary revascularization, atherosclerotic ischemic stroke/TIA, symptomatic PAD, or other clinically established atherosclerotic arterial disease. Incidental aortic calcium alone is not a clinical event.Use phenotype-specific ASCVD stack (P.17); do not relabel hemorrhagic/cardioembolic stroke, SCAD, vasospasm, or isolated type-2 MI as conventional ASCVD.
LDL-CLDL ≥190 mg/dL / probable FH; established ASCVD; or guideline-defined diabetes, CKD stage ≥3, or HIV treatment pathway.Treat the condition. PREVENT may refine intensity in eligible primary prevention, but is not a residual-risk calculator for known CVD.
Stage-1 BPKnown CVD/prior stroke, diabetes, or CKD; or average BP ≥140/90.For otherwise eligible BP 130–139/80–89, use 10-y PREVENT-CVD; ≥7.5% supports medication now.
Primary preventionNo direct indication, age 30–79 and no known CVD. For the lipid pathway, LDL-C 70–189 mg/dL and no known subclinical atherosclerosis.Use PREVENT-ASCVD for lipids and PREVENT-CVD/HF for total CVD/HF decisions.
2

The one-visit close

five actions
A · IdentifyASCVD phenotype · CKM stage · severe LDL/FH · hypertension pattern · cancer exposure · pregnancy/frailty.
B · QuantifyValidated home BP · LDL/non-HDL · A1c · eGFR + UACR · tobacco · weight/waist · PREVENT result when valid.
C · PersonalizeFamily history · Lp(a) · apoB/TG · CAC only if uncertainty remains · reproductive/inflammatory/HIV context · access.
D · PrescribeNumeric BP/LDL goals · drug + dose · lifestyle prescription · safety labs · affordability/adherence solution.
E · DateFirst check, lab recheck, titration decision, and next appointment—not “follow up as needed.”
Leave this card now SBP >180 or DBP >120 with acute neurologic, cardiac, aortic, retinal, or renal injury; new focal deficit, exertional chest pressure, syncope, limb ischemia, or decompensated HF requires an emergency/diagnostic pathway.
One-line plan Risk lane ____ · CKM stage ____ · BP target ____ · LDL/non-HDL target ____ · therapy today ____ · labs ____ · next date ____
3

Commit the plan before sign-out

owner + date + escalation rule
Data ownerWho obtains the home BP, outside records, lipid response, eGFR/UACR, or sleep study—and by what date?
Therapy ownerName the drug, dose, access route, lifestyle prescription, and who resolves intolerance or denial.
Safety ownerList baseline/first-check labs, sick-day or procedure holds, pregnancy plan, and symptoms that trigger a call.
Escalation ownerPre-write the next step if BP, LDL, weight complication, adherence, or safety result remains outside target.
START · RISK · LIPIDS · BP · CKM · PEOPLE · ONCOLOGY · ASCVD · FOLLOW-UP · EVIDENCE
2026 operating system: pair PREVENT with CKM stage. PREVENT estimates 10-year ASCVD, HF, and total CVD risk at age 30–79 and 30-year risk at age 30–59 in adults without known CVD; CKM stage identifies the disease state and organ-protection pathway.
1

Minimum dataset

measure once · act repeatedly
PressureHome BPValidated upper-arm cuff; orthostatics when indicated.
AtherogenicLDL · non-HDLLp(a) once; apoB for discordance; TG phenotype.
Kidney · glucoseeGFR + UACRA1c/glucose; repeat abnormal albuminuria to establish chronicity.
Whole patientTobacco · waistSleep, activity, diet, medications, pregnancy, access, mood.
2

Choose the PREVENT output that answers the question

validated age 30–79 · no known CVD
OutputUseThreshold / boundary
PREVENT-ASCVDPrimary-prevention lipid decisions.10-y: low <3%, borderline 3–<5%, intermediate 5–<10%, high ≥10%. In age 30–59 with 10-y <3%, statin is reasonable if LDL 160–189 or 30-y ASCVD ≥10%.
PREVENT-CVDStage-1 BP decision and total CVD framing.At BP 130–139/80–89 without CVD/stroke, diabetes, or CKD: ≥7.5% supports medication now.
PREVENT-HFCKM/HF risk; selective pre-HF biomarker/echo discussion.In CKM stages 0–3, ≥5% can support selected natriuretic peptide/hs-troponin testing and echocardiography when indicated—not blanket screening.
Do not extrapolateKnown CVD, age outside 30–79, or inputs outside model range.Use disease-specific guidance, clinical judgment, competing risk, frailty, and time-to-benefit.
3

CKM stage → protective layer

eGFR + UACR drive action
Stage 0No CKM risk factors.Preserve cardiovascular health; periodic rescreen.
Stage 1Excess/dysfunctional adiposity or prediabetes only.Treat weight complications early; prevent progression to multiple metabolic risks.
Stage 2HTN, TG ≥150, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, or moderate/high-risk CKD.Quantify CVD/HF risk; layer BP, lipid, glucose, kidney, and obesity therapy.
Stage 3Subclinical CVD (e.g., CAC ≥100, plaque, ABI <0.9, pre-HF), PREVENT-CVD ≥20%, or very-high-risk CKD.High-intensity prevention; evaluate subclinical disease only when it changes management.
Stage 4Clinical CVD plus a CKM risk factor or CKD.Secondary prevention + organ-protection stack; 4a no kidney failure / 4b kidney failure.
PhenotypeAdd to the foundationSafety / boundary
Albuminuric CKD + HTNMax tolerated ACEi or ARB; BP goal generally <130/80.Check K/creatinine after start/titration; never ACEi + ARB.
CKD ± T2DSGLT2 inhibitor at eGFR ≥20 for T2D+CKD; without diabetes, strong indication with UACR ≥200 mg/g or HF, with broader CKD use by phenotype.Usually continue below eGFR 20 until KRT if tolerated. A modest initial eGFR dip is expected. Evaluate a fall >30%, volume loss or intercurrent illness rather than accepting it automatically.
T2D + ASCVD/high riskSGLT2 inhibitor and/or GLP-1 receptor agonist with proven CV benefit, independent of A1c; combination may be considered.Match the agent and enrolled phenotype; class labels are not interchangeable.
T2D + albuminuric CKDACEi/ARB + SGLT2 inhibitor; add finerenone if eGFR ≥25, K normal, and UACR ≥30 despite max tolerated RAAS therapy.K/eGFR baseline and ~4 weeks; hold/adjust by label and interactions.
HF across EFSGLT2 inhibitor unless contraindicated; add phenotype-specific HF therapy.Do not prescribe as generic “post-MI prevention” without HF/CKD/diabetes indication.
CKM 2–3 + T2DAt PREVENT-CVD ≥7.5%, favor SGLT2 for CKD/pre-HF and GLP-1 for class II+ obesity, marked hyperglycemia, or MASLD.Weight/glucose change alone is not proof of MACE benefit for every agent.
SGLT2 · beforeeGFR, volume/BP, DKA/insulin-deficiency history, genital-infection risk, diuretic burden.
Hold3 d before surgery/fasting; 4 d for ertugliflozin; also acute illness, poor intake, dehydration.
WatchGI symptoms, tachypnea, malaise, ketones—even with normal glucose; mycotic infection and volume loss.
RestartClinically stable, eating/drinking normally, ketone concern resolved, kidney/volume status acceptable.
Kidney pair + cadence eGFR alone misses albuminuric risk; UACR alone misses filtration loss. Obtain both, confirm chronicity, and repeat at least annually in diabetes—more often with CKD, treatment change, progression risk, electrolyte vulnerability, or intercurrent illness.
Screen wisely CAC is a selective decision aid, not population screening. Do not routinely screen asymptomatic low-risk adults with ECG/stress imaging or carotid ultrasound. One-time AAA ultrasound: men 65–75 who ever smoked; selective use in never-smokers.
START · RISK · LIPIDS · BP · CKM · PEOPLE · ONCOLOGY · ASCVD · FOLLOW-UP · EVIDENCE
2026 lipid reset: start earlier, treat for lifetime exposure, and pair the expected percentage reduction with absolute LDL-C and non-HDL-C goals. Use enough potency to close the gap.
1

Phenotype → initial intensity → goal

shared decision does not mean delay
WhoStartLDL / non-HDL goalEscalate when
LDL ≥190 or probable FHHigh-intensity statin; consider combination from start.≥50% reduction; <100/<130 if no HeFH/major risk/plaque; <70/<100 if HeFH, added risk, or calcification.Goal/gap not closed; early lipid-specialist + cascade-screening pathway.
Age 30–59; 10-y <3%Moderate statin is reasonable if LDL 160–189 or 30-y PREVENT-ASCVD ≥10%.Track lifetime exposure and response.Risk enhancers, high Lp(a), strong family history, or CAC if genuinely uncertain.
Borderline 3–<5%LLT reasonable after discussion.<100 / <130Goal not met or risk-enhancer burden favors more intensity.
Intermediate 5–<10%LLT recommended after discussion.<100 / <130Goal not met; usually moderate/high-intensity statin.
High ≥10%High-intensity statin; combination if large gap.<70 / <100Add nonstatin promptly to goal.
Diabetes · CKD ≥3 · HIVAge ≥40 generally enters direct treatment pathway; check interactions/phenotype.Risk-category goal; higher-risk patients often <70.Goal not met or subclinical/clinical disease raises risk.
Clinical ASCVDHigh-intensity/max-tolerated statin ± early add-on.<70 if not very high risk.Any recurrence, major-event burden, or persistent gap.
Very-high-risk ASCVDMaximal combination therapy.<55 / <85Do not wait through serial low-impact titrations.
Very-high-risk is not every ASCVD patient. The 2026 definition requires ≥2 major ASCVD events, or 1 major event plus ≥2 high-risk features. Major events: ACS within 12 months, prior MI other than recent ACS, ischemic stroke or symptomatic PAD. Features: age ≥65, prior CABG/PCI, current smoking, diabetes, HF, hypertension or LDL ≥100 despite maximal statin + ezetimibe. Count events and features explicitly.
2

Lp(a), apoB & familial hypercholesterolemia

measure what changes action
MarkerWhen / thresholdAction
Lp(a)Measure once in every adult; ≥125 nmol/L or ≥50 mg/dL is a risk enhancer. Do not use a fixed mass↔molar conversion.Intensify proven prevention, screen family when appropriate, and recognize very high burden (around ≥250 nmol/L). Do not infer event benefit from Lp(a) lowering alone. See the dated outcome-trial update on P.21.
apoBUseful with high TG, diabetes/CKM, obesity, or discordance despite apparently acceptable LDL/non-HDL.Reveals residual atherogenic-particle burden; use to refine intensity, not as an unsupported universal target.
Suspected FHPersistent untreated LDL ≥190, premature ASCVD, tendon xanthoma, arcus before age 45, strong premature family history, or a pathogenic variant.LDL ≥190 triggers treatment but does not by itself prove monogenic FH. Reconstruct baseline LDL, exclude acquired causes, then use the formal diagnosis/cascade pathway on P.4.
3

CAC only when the result can change the choice

graduated 2026 targets
CAC 0May defer in selected uncertainty only—never to de-risk LDL ≥190/FH, diabetes after 40, current smoking, or strong premature family history. If therapy is deferred, consider repeat CAC in 3–7 years according to baseline risk. This is not a guarantee against events.
CAC 1–99 and <75th percentileSubclinical atherosclerosis: ≥30% LDL reduction, LDL <100, non-HDL <130.
CAC ≥100 or ≥75th percentilePrefer ≥50% LDL reduction; LDL <70, non-HDL <100.
CAC ≥300≥50% reduction and LDL <70; LDL <55 is reasonable.
CAC ≥1,000LDL <55, non-HDL <85. Moderate/severe incidental CAC on nongated CT supports the ≥50% / <70 pathway.
Track response with lipids, not serial calcium scans. Statins can increase plaque calcification while reducing risk. A rising CAC score alone is not treatment failure. Track absolute LDL, percentage reduction, adherence and symptoms.
4

Combine reductions, then measure the result

illustrative arithmetic
Sequential LDL reductions: 160 to 80 to 64 mg/dL A hypothetical 50 percent reduction leaves 80 mg/dL. An additional 20 percent reduction acts on 80, leaving 64 mg/dL. The total reduction is 60 percent, not 70 percent. BaselineAfter 50% reductionThen 20% of the remainder 1608064
160 × 0.50 × 0.80 = 64 mg/dL
Illustration, not an individual response prediction. This is a 60% total reduction. Add-on percentages do not add. Choose therapy by the remaining absolute gap, then recheck lipids in 4–12 weeks.
Complete example shown.
START · RISK · LIPIDS · BP · CKM · PEOPLE · ONCOLOGY · ASCVD · FOLLOW-UP · EVIDENCE
New July 2026 Enlicitide is now an FDA-approved once-daily oral PCSK9 inhibitor for adult hypercholesterolemia including HeFH; LDL lowering is established, but MACE reduction awaits CORALreef Outcomes.
1

Use the potency required by the gap

start · effect · recheck · avoid/hold
Agent / startTypical LDL effectEvidence / useMonitor · avoid/hold
Atorvastatin 40–80
Rosuvastatin 20–40
≥50%Outcomes foundation; maximize tolerated dose.ALT baseline; CK only with symptoms/high risk. Review pregnancy and interactions.
Moderate statin30–49%Atorvastatin 10–20, rosuvastatin 5–10, pravastatin 40–80, pitavastatin 1–4 mg.Use lower-interaction options deliberately; none is interaction-free.
Ezetimibe 10 mg/d~18–25%Oral, low cost, outcomes-proven add-on.Few interactions; recheck lipids 4–12 weeks.
Bempedoic acid 180 mg/d~17–25%Outcome benefit in statin-intolerant ASCVD/high-risk patients.Uric acid/gout, tendon symptoms, cholelithiasis; check interactions.
PCSK9 monoclonal antibody~50–60%Evolocumab/alirocumab: hard-outcome benefit; close large gaps quickly.Injection/access burden; confirm response and adherence.
Inclisiran~50%Day 0, 3 months, then q6 months; surrogate LDL evidence.Outcome trials pending; do not claim MACE benefit yet.
Enlicitide~56–59% at 24 weeks in approval trialsFirst oral PCSK9 inhibitor; daily alternative for eligible adults.Approved on LDL lowering; outcomes pending. Follow label, interactions, adherence.
2

Statin-associated symptoms: preserve proven therapy

diagnose before declaring intolerance
1 · CharacterizeTiming, symmetry, proximal weakness, exercise; medication/supplement interactions, TSH, vitamin D only when clinically indicated.
2 · Safety exitSevere weakness, dark urine, marked CK elevation, renal injury, or objective liver injury → stop and evaluate urgently.
3 · Dechallenge / rechallengeAfter symptoms resolve, try lower dose, different statin, or alternate-day long-half-life statin; document response.
4 · CombineAny tolerated statin + ezetimibe/bempedoic acid/PCSK9-directed therapy usually beats abandoning statins and missing the LDL goal.
3

Triglycerides: separate MACE from pancreatitis

phenotype before product
TGDo nowDrug boundary
150–499Address alcohol, glycemia, weight, diet, hypothyroidism, kidney/liver disease and drugs; optimize statin by ASCVD risk.Icosapent ethyl 2 g BID: US risk-reduction label requires TG ≥150 on maximal tolerated statin plus CVD, or diabetes + ≥2 additional CV risk factors. Monitor AF/flutter and bleeding.
500–999Secondary causes, alcohol abstinence, dietary fat/carbohydrate strategy, diabetes control; consider fibrate or prescription omega-3.Pancreatitis pathway. Olezarsen is labeled from TG ≥500: 50 mg SC monthly, increasing to 80 mg if tolerated and more lowering is needed. Review liver tests, hypersensitivity and access.
≥1,000Chylomicronemia pathway: very-low-fat diet, urgent secondary-cause control, specialist evaluation; assess pancreatitis symptoms.Urgent specialist pathway if symptoms or persistent severe elevation. Olezarsen eligibility begins at TG ≥500, not only ≥1,000. For familial chylomicronemia syndrome the labeled dose is 80 mg monthly.
Evidence + monitoring Statins, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, and PCSK9 mAbs have outcomes evidence in defined populations. Inclisiran and enlicitide have powerful LDL-lowering evidence while dedicated outcomes trials remain pending. Baseline lipids + ALT; repeat lipids 4–12 weeks after start/change, then every 3–12 months by stability and adherence.
4

Document intolerance so treatment can continue

symptom story + response + replacement
ExposureDrug, dose, start/change date, interacting medicines, exercise/illness context, and prior tolerated statin.
PhenotypeLocation, symmetry, timing, weakness, CK/renal/liver findings when indicated, and competing cause.
CausalityResponse to dechallenge, time to resolution, rechallenge agent/dose, and whether symptoms recur.
Replacement planMaximally tolerated statin exposure + nonstatin combination, expected LDL effect, recheck date, and access plan.
START · RISK · LIPIDS · BP · CKM · PEOPLE · ONCOLOGY · ASCVD · FOLLOW-UP · EVIDENCE
Measure first, then treat. Confirm persistent hypertension with standardized office technique plus validated upper-arm home BP or ambulatory monitoring. Usual treatment goal is <130/80, individualized for orthostasis, frailty, pregnancy, and competing illness.
1

Home BP protocol

average, not the single highest value
PrepareNo nicotine, caffeine, or exercise for 30 minutes; empty bladder; sit quietly 5 minutes.
PositionBack supported, feet flat, legs uncrossed, arm supported at heart level, correct cuff on bare skin.
SampleTwo readings 1 minute apart morning and evening for ≥3, preferably 7, days; average all valid readings. If a validated analysis plan discards day 1, document it.
ValidateCompare device with clinic equipment; cuffless watches are not a diagnostic substitute.
2

Category → threshold → timing

2025 ACC/AHA pathway
Average BPCategoryAction
<120 and <80NormalMaintain cardiovascular health; reassess at least yearly.
120–129 and <80ElevatedLifestyle; reassess in 3–6 months.
130–139 or 80–89Stage 1Drug now for CVD/prior stroke, diabetes, CKD, or 10-y PREVENT-CVD ≥7.5%; otherwise lifestyle 3–6 months, then medicate if still ≥130/80.
≥140 or ≥90Stage 2Start 2 complementary first-line drugs, preferably a single-pill combination; review in ~1 month.
SBP >180 or DBP >120SevereRepeat correctly. Acute target-organ injury → emergency. No acute injury → prompt same-day/rapid evaluation and oral adjustment; do not crash BP.
3

Intensive SBP: translate the evidence carefully

standardized measurement
Target<130/80 for most treated adults. In selected high-CV/kidney-risk patients, a standardized SBP target near <120 may be reasonable if tolerated.
Evidence expansionSPRINT excluded diabetes/prior stroke; BPROAD and ESPRIT extend intensive-treatment evidence to diabetes and broader high-risk groups.
MonitorStanding BP, falls/syncope, Na/K/creatinine, volume status, cognition/function, and home values after each intensification.
IndividualizePregnancy, symptomatic orthostasis, frailty, limited life expectancy, autonomic dysfunction, or very low DBP with ischemic symptoms.
White coat / masked Out-of-office BP separates these phenotypes. Do not escalate white-coat hypertension from office values alone; do not dismiss high home/ambulatory BP because clinic BP is normal.
4

Out-of-office pattern → next move

confirm the phenotype
Office + home highSustained hypertension: verify technique/adherence, quantify target-organ risk, and treat to the individualized goal.
Office high · home normalPossible white-coat effect: validate device/technique and use ambulatory monitoring when uncertainty changes treatment.
Office normal · home highPossible masked hypertension: confirm with structured home/ambulatory data; do not dismiss the out-of-office burden.
Large variabilityCheck timing, missed doses, pain/anxiety, alcohol, OSA, autonomic/volume shifts, interacting drugs, and measurement error before adding therapy.
StartWrite the numeric target, home protocol, medication plan, and first safety check together.
RecheckBring cuff + log; compare achieved versus expected response, standing symptoms, adherence, and labs.
IntensifyPrefer complementary, long-acting agents and single-pill combinations when the confirmed average remains high.
Do not chaseA single peak, pain reading, unvalidated wearable, or asymptomatic low office value without context.
START · RISK · LIPIDS · BP · CKM · PEOPLE · ONCOLOGY · ASCVD · FOLLOW-UP · EVIDENCE
One complementary combination beats serial monotherapy. For stage 2, begin an ACEi/ARB + long-acting DHP-CCB or thiazide-like diuretic unless a phenotype dictates otherwise; simplify to a single pill when possible.
1

Drug grid

start · prefer · recheck · avoid
Class / startPreferFirst checkAvoid / caution
Losartan 50 mg
Lisinopril 10 mg
Albuminuric CKD, diabetes, CAD/HF.K + creatinine in ~1–2 weeks if high risk, no later than 2–4 weeks.Pregnancy; ACEi + ARB; hyperkalemia/AKI.
Amlodipine 5 mgPotent, once daily; useful with many oncology agents.BP, edema in ~2–4 weeks.Edema; check interactions before non-DHP CCB.
Chlorthalidone 12.5 mg
Indapamide 1.25 mg
Outcome-proven volume/BP control; still useful in advanced CKD with monitoring.Na/K/creatinine, volume in 1–2 weeks.Hyponatremia, gout, volume depletion.
Spironolactone 12.5–25 mgPreferred 4th drug in confirmed resistant HTN.K within 1 week of starting or titrating, then regularly. Check renal function and more often with CKD/interactions.Hyperkalemia, advanced CKD, endocrine adverse effects.
β-blockerCAD/angina, HFrEF, arrhythmia, aortic disease.Pulse, BP, symptoms.Not routine first-line without a compelling indication.
2

Confirmed resistant hypertension

definition before escalation
DefineUncontrolled on 3 complementary maximally tolerated drugs (normally ACEi/ARB + long-acting DHP-CCB + appropriate diuretic), or controlled on ≥4.
Exclude pseudo-resistanceTechnique, white-coat effect, missed doses, undertitration, inadequate diuresis, high sodium/alcohol, NSAIDs, stimulants, OCPs, steroids.
Screen causesPrimary aldosteronism, OSA, CKD/renovascular disease, thyroid disease; pheochromocytoma/Cushing only with clues. Interpret ARR around interfering medications. Correct hypokalemia before interpreting a negative screen. Use a safe minimal- or no-withdrawal strategy when needed.
LayerOptimize diuretic → spironolactone when safe → specialist-directed alternatives/device evaluation.
3

What changed

new does not mean event-proven
Primary aldosteronism · 2025Endocrine Society conditionally suggests aldosterone/renin screening in all hypertension when feasible—not only hypokalemia/resistance.
Baxdrostat · FDA 2026Add-on for inadequately controlled adult HTN; usual 2 mg daily (1 mg if higher K/Na risk). Monitor K, Na, eGFR; initiation below eGFR 45 is not established. BP lowering proven; CV-event reduction is not.
Aprocitentan12.5 mg daily add-on for uncontrolled HTN; edema/fluid retention, anemia, hepatotoxicity precautions, and boxed pregnancy warning.
Renal denervationCan lower BP in selected resistant/uncontrolled patients at expert centers; hard-event prevention remains unproven.
4

Secondary cause: clue → focused action

screen broadly; test selectively
Primary aldosteronismHypertension itself now supports feasible aldosterone/renin screening; prioritize resistant HTN, hypokalemia, adrenal lesion, OSA, or early/familial disease. Interpret around medications and potassium.
OSASnoring, witnessed apnea, sleepiness, AF, obesity, resistant/nocturnal HTN → diagnostic sleep pathway; questionnaire alone does not diagnose.
Kidney / renovasculareGFR, UACR, urinalysis and trajectory first; abrupt onset/worsening, asymmetric kidneys, flash pulmonary edema, or creatinine rise may justify targeted imaging.
Endocrine / aorticTSH when indicated; metanephrines or cortisol only with clinical clues; compare arm/leg pulses and evaluate coarctation in the right phenotype.
Drug / substanceNSAIDs, stimulants, decongestants, OCPs, steroids, calcineurin/mTOR agents, alcohol, nicotine, licorice, supplements, and missed/short-acting doses.
START · RISK · LIPIDS · BP · OBESITY + OSA · PEOPLE · ONCOLOGY · ASCVD · FOLLOW-UP · EVIDENCE
Obesity is a chronic, relapsing disease and a cardiovascular treatment target. Treat complications, function, and patient goals - not BMI alone. Lifestyle, medication, devices, and surgery are complementary; do not require serial "failure" before offering effective therapy.
1

Phenotype before product

baseline packet
AdiposityBMI + waistDated height/weight, trajectory, prior loss/regain, body composition when useful.
ComplicationsCVD · HF · CKDBP, lipids, T2D/prediabetes, OSA, MASH, OA, PCOS/fertility.
DriversSleep · drugsEating pattern, mood/ED risk, alcohol, steroids/insulin/psychotropics, mobility.
FunctionMuscle · frailtyStrength, falls, sarcopenia, protein/nutrition risk, resistance-training access.
2

Before first dose and at every escalation

closed-loop safety
ScreenPregnancy/plans; personal/family MTC or MEN2; prior serious reaction; severe gastroparesis; pancreatitis/gallbladder history; retinopathy; eating disorder/frailty; kidney/volume risk.Reconcile all diabetes/weight products, insulin/SU, diuretics/BP drugs, oral contraception, narrow-index drugs, and statins with Foundayo.
MeasureDated weight/BMI/waist, BP/orthostasis, pulse, A1c/glucose, eGFR when indicated; symptoms, intake, strength/function, OSA/HF/MASH target.Contact at each dose step. Delay escalation or adjust treatment within the product's labeled maintenance options. Some products require discontinuation or a formulation switch if the maintenance dose is not tolerated.
Prevent hypoglycemiaGLP-1 therapy alone rarely causes clinically important hypoglycemia; insulin and sulfonylureas do.Preemptively plan glucose monitoring and dose reduction; do not reflexively stop metformin/SGLT2 organ protection.
Treat GI effectsSmaller/lower-fat meals, stop when full, fluids/electrolytes, constipation plan; slow or pause titration.Persistent vomiting, dehydration/AKI, severe continuous abdominal pain, jaundice, or obstruction symptoms → stop/evaluate, not “push through.”
ReproductiveStop weight-loss drugs when pregnancy is recognized; stop semaglutide ≥2mo before planned pregnancy.For oral contraceptive users, use a nonoral method or add a barrier for 4 weeks after starting or increasing tirzepatide, and for 30 days after starting or increasing orforglipron.
3

Procedure / anesthesia plan

risk-stratified, not automatic holds
Most patientsMay continue GLP-1/GIP therapy before elective surgery/endoscopy after prescriber-proceduralist-anesthesia review.
Higher gastric riskEscalation phase, high dose, weekly drug, active nausea/vomiting/dyspepsia/constipation/distention, gastroparesis, or another emptying disorder.
MitigateDefer elective care until escalation/symptoms resolve when feasible; liquid-only diet ≥24h, aspiration-aware anesthesia, selective gastric ultrasound.
If holdingOptimal interval is unknown. Older fallback: daily drug on procedure day, weekly drug 7d. Plan glycemia; evidence is insufficient that holding prevents aspiration.
4

Build a chronic-treatment roadmap

benefit, function, durability
1 · MatchChoose the modality by complication, labeled indication, desired magnitude, contraindications, prior response, access, and patient preference.
2 · ProtectPair adequate protein/energy intake with progressive resistance exercise; track strength, falls, frailty, and sarcopenia risk—not weight alone.
3 · De-escalate safelyAs weight/BP/glucose fall, review insulin/SU, diuretic and antihypertensive doses; prevent hypoglycemia, orthostasis, and volume injury.
4 · MaintainDefine effective dose, refill/coverage fallback, monitoring cadence, and the plan for interruption, surgery, pregnancy, or recurrent weight.
Response is multidimensional: weight/waist + complication response + function/strength + symptoms/quality of life + tolerability + adherence/access. A plateau is not automatic treatment failure.
START · RISK · LIPIDS · BP · OBESITY + OSA · PEOPLE · ONCOLOGY · ASCVD · FOLLOW-UP · EVIDENCE
Label checks Oct 17, 2026 All U.S. obesity-labeled incretins: semaglutide (Wegovy injection/HD/tablets), tirzepatide (Zepbound), liraglutide (Saxenda), and oral nonpeptide orforglipron (Foundayo). Compare trials cautiously: populations, diabetes status, duration, and missing-data methods differ.
A

Obesity-labeled incretins

dose · anchor result · boundary
ProductStart → maintenanceAnchor weight resultDo not miss
Wegovy SC0.25 weekly x4wk → 0.5 → 1 → 1.7 → 2.4. Weight: 1.7/2.4; after ≥4wk at 2.4, may go directly to 7.2.2.4: -14.9% vs -2.4% at 68wk. 7.2: -18.8% vs -15.5% on 2.4 vs -3.9% at 72wk.CV: 1.7/2.4. MASH: 2.4 recommended, 1.7 if not tolerated. HD dysesthesia 22%. No pediatric HD.
Wegovy tablets1.5 daily d1-30 → 4 d31-60 → 9 d61-90 → 25 daily. Empty stomach, ≤4 oz water; wait ≥30 min.-13.6% vs -2.4% at 64wk; no weight trial in T2D.Adult weight + MACE labels; SELECT directly tested SC 2.4, not tablet 25.
Zepbound2.5 weekly x4wk → 5; +2.5 no sooner than q4wk. Weight: 5/10/15. OSA: 10/15. Max 15.No T2D: -15.0/-19.5/-20.9% vs -3.1% at 72wk.Oral contraception backup x4wk after start/each escalation; no obesity MACE claim.
Oral 2026 Foundayo0.8 daily ≥30d → 2.5 ≥30d → 5.5; may advance 9 → 14.5 → 17.2, each ≥30d. With/without food.No T2D: -7.4/-8.3/-11.1% vs -2.1% at 72wk.No MACE/OSA claim. Simvastatin max 20 mg; major CYP3A4/OATP interaction review.
Saxenda0.6 daily wk1 → 1.2 → 1.8 → 2.4 → 3 mg wk5+. Stop adult if <4% loss at wk16.-7.4% vs -3.0% at 56wk.No Saxenda MACE claim; LEADER tested Victoza 1.8 in high-risk T2D.
B

Non-incretin and rare-disease options

outcomes unestablished unless stated
Phentermine/topiramate ER3.75/23 x14d → 7.5/46; at 12wk, <3% → 11.25/69 x14d then 15/92; stop if <5% after 12wk and taper highest dose.-7.8% to -9.8% vs -1.2% at 1y. Pregnancy contraindicated. Test before starting and monthly when pregnancy is possible, with effective contraception/REMS. Avoid glaucoma, hyperthyroidism and MAOI. Monitor HR, mood, cognition, bicarbonate and stones.
Naltrexone/bupropion ER8/90: 1 AM → 1 BID → 2 AM/1 PM → 2 BID; stop if <5% after 12wk maintenance.-5.4% vs -1.3%. Avoid uncontrolled HTN, seizure/eating disorder/withdrawal, opioids, MAOI; CYP2D6 interactions.
Orlistat120 mg TID with fat-containing meal (Alli 60 mg OTC); multivitamin A/D/E/K ≥2h apart.Modest (~3% placebo-corrected). GI urgency, malabsorption/cholestasis, oxalate nephropathy; warfarin/cyclosporine/levothyroxine review.
Short-term sympathomimeticsPhentermine, diethylpropion, benzphetamine, phendimetrazine are labeled only for a few weeks.Avoid CVD/arrhythmia/uncontrolled HTN, hyperthyroid, glaucoma, pregnancy, MAOI. Not a chronic CV-prevention strategy.
SetmelanotideSpecialist/genetic pathway for POMC/PCSK1/LEPR deficiency, Bardet-Biedl syndrome, or labeled acquired hypothalamic obesity.Not common polygenic obesity; monitor pigmentation/nevi, sexual effects, depression, adrenal/sodium issues.
Brand firewall: Ozempic/Rybelsus (semaglutide), Mounjaro (tirzepatide), Victoza/generic liraglutide, Trulicity, Byetta/Bydureon BCise, Adlyxin, Soliqua, and Xultophy are diabetes products - not obesity products. No dose-for-dose substitution and never combine incretins or same-molecule brands.
C

Durability, products & procedures

maintenance before rescue
Interruption / switchUse product-specific missed-dose/restart instructions; after longer gaps, re-titrate for GI tolerance. Confirm new presentation and train. Do not improvise dose equivalence.Plan access fallback before the last dose; document baseline BMI and on-treatment response.
Product integrityPrefer FDA-approved product. Do not use “research” products or assume compounded semaglutide/tirzepatide is interchangeable; verify formulation, source, and current FDA shortage/enforcement status.FDA requested removal of the GLP-1 suicidality warning in Jan 2026; Contrave/Imcivree retain product-specific warnings.
Metabolic surgerySleeve/RYGB and other procedures offer the most durable large loss for eligible patients; refer by complication/goal, not only after every drug fails.Lifelong micronutrient, bone, muscle, hypoglycemia, alcohol, absorption, and surgical follow-up.
Device 2026 Gastric balloonAllurion swallowable balloon is FDA-approved for short-term limited loss in age 22-65, BMI 30-40 after an unsuccessful program.Not a GLP-1 substitute or CV-outcome therapy; endoscopy/surgery backup, contraindications, and coverage vary.
START · RISK · LIPIDS · BP · OBESITY + OSA · PEOPLE · ONCOLOGY · ASCVD · FOLLOW-UP · EVIDENCE
Outcome claims belong to the tested molecule, dose, product, population, and endpoint. Weight loss, noninferiority to an active comparator, and biomarker change are not interchangeable with placebo-superior MACE reduction.
A

Match the highest-value indication

label ≠ class analogy
Dominant phenotypePreferred evidence laneBoundary
Established CVD + overweight/obesityWegovy 2.4 mg SC (1.7 if needed) or 25 mg tablet carries adult MACE-risk-reduction labeling; SELECT used SC 2.4 mg.Wegovy HD 7.2 mg is a weight dose, not the CV-label dose.
Moderate-severe OSA + BMI ≥30Zepbound 10 or 15 mg weekly is FDA-labeled; treat anatomy, sleepiness, hypoxemia, and PAP barriers in parallel.Weight response never authorizes automatic PAP withdrawal; retest.
Obesity-related HFpEFSemaglutide and tirzepatide improve health status/weight; SUMMIT reduced worsening-HF/CV-death composite.Evidence is phenotype-specific; neither product has a general HF indication.
T2D + ASCVD/CKDChoose the diabetes-labeled GLP-1/GIP product with matched CV/kidney evidence, then solve weight and glycemia together.Diabetes and obesity brands/doses are not interchangeable.
Noncirrhotic MASH F2-F3Wegovy injection has accelerated-approval labeling. Use 2.4 mg weekly, or 1.7 mg if 2.4 is not tolerated, with consideration of re-escalation. Coordinate hepatology and fibrosis follow-up.Tablets and HD 7.2 mg do not carry this indication.
Large durable loss neededDiscuss metabolic surgery at BMI ≥35 regardless of comorbidity; consider BMI 30-34.9 with metabolic disease or inadequate nonsurgical response.Shared choice, surgical risk, nutrition, bone/muscle, absorption, lifelong follow-up.
B

What is proven now

patient-important outcomes
TrialPopulation / therapyResultTranslation
SELECT17,604 adults ≥45 years with BMI ≥27 and established CVD, without diabetes. Semaglutide 2.4 mg SC weekly.MACE 6.5% vs 8.0%; HR 0.80.Direct obesity-CV evidence; secondary prevention.
FLOW / SOULT2D + albuminuric CKD / high-risk ASCVD-CKD; semaglutide.FLOW kidney/CV-death HR 0.76; SOUL MACE 12.0% vs 13.8%, HR 0.86.Diabetes/CKD evidence, not generic obesity claims.
LEADER / REWINDHigh-risk T2D; liraglutide 1.8 / dulaglutide 1.5.MACE HR 0.87 / 0.88.Victoza/Trulicity diabetes evidence; not Saxenda.
SURPASS-CVOT13,299 randomized, 13,165 analyzed. T2D + ASCVD. Tirzepatide vs dulaglutide 1.5 mg weekly.MACE HR 0.92 (95.3% CI 0.83–1.01).Noninferior, not superior, to dulaglutide. Mounjaro gained a T2D/high-CV-risk MACE label in Aug 2026. Zepbound has no obesity MACE claim.
SUMMITHFpEF + BMI ≥30; tirzepatide vs placebo.CV death/worsening HF 9.9% vs 15.3%; HR 0.62.Driven by worsening HF; no general HF label.
SURMOUNT-OSA467 in the FDA label's two studies. Moderate-severe OSA + obesity. Tirzepatide 10/15 mg weekly.AHI difference -20.0 / -23.8 events/h; remission/mild nonsymptomatic 42.2% / 50.2%.FDA OSA indication; trials did not define PAP stopping.
C

Outcome pipeline

registry checked Oct 17, 2026
Trial / statusAgentQuestionPrimary completion
SURMOUNT-MMONCT05556512 · active, not recruitingTirzepatide; N=15,374Death, MI/stroke, revascularization, HF events.Oct 2027
ATTAIN-OSANCT06649045 · completedOrforglipron. N=712 actualAHI at 52 weeks. No registry results posted and no OSA label.Jul 2026 actual
REDEFINE 3NCT05669755 · active, not recruitingCagriSema; N=7,101MACE-3 and kidney outcomes.Sep 2027
MARITIME-CV / TRIUMPHNCT07037433 / NCT06383390MariTide N≈12,800 / retatrutide N≈10,000MACE/HF/death; TRIUMPH also kidney composite.Jun 2028 / Feb 2029
ATTAIN-OutcomesNCT07241390 · recruitingOrforglipron; N≈7,140MACE/HF/revascularization/death in ASCVD/CKD.Aug 2031
SYNCHRONIZE-CVOTNCT06077864 · completedSurvodutide; N=5,531Five-component CV/HF noninferiority; no posted results.Jun 2026
Investigational means unavailable: do not prescribe "research" retatrutide, CagriSema, survodutide, or maridebart cafraglutide, and do not infer benefit from a passed registry date. See P.19–22 for the broader prevention trial ledger.
START · RISK · LIPIDS · BP · OBESITY + OSA · PEOPLE · ONCOLOGY · ASCVD · FOLLOW-UP · EVIDENCE
Authorization is an indication-and-documentation task. Employer exclusions, preferred brands, step therapy, program duration, renewal thresholds, and pharmacy channels vary by plan/PBM; verify the live policy rather than copying another payer's rule.
1

One defensible PA packet

submit together
A · Product + indicationExact brand, formulation/presentation, dose, quantity, NDC when required; obesity vs MACE vs OSA vs T2D vs MASH diagnosis.
B · Objective phenotypeDated height/weight/BMI at initiation; prior MI/stroke/PAD records; PSG/AHI; HFpEF; serial BP + 2-drug list; eGFR/UACR; fibrosis staging.
C · Required historyStructured nutrition/activity dates, prior trajectory, plan-preferred therapies tried, intolerance/contraindication, and why this option matches outcome evidence.
D · Safety + duplicationPregnancy/MTC/MEN2/gastroparesis screen; no concurrent incretin/same molecule; titration, monitoring, and hypoglycemia plan.
E · RenewalWeight and percent change, achieved dose, adherence/possession, adverse effects, function and complication response; use the live plan continuation rule.
2

Medicare GLP-1 Bridge

live Jul 1, 2026-Dec 31, 2027
$50 / 28-30 d For eligible Part D beneficiaries, outside the Part D benefit: payment does not count toward the Part D deductible or TrOOP. Products: all Foundayo; all Wegovy injection/HD/tablets; Zepbound KwikPen only - not Zepbound single-dose pens/vials.
BMI laneRequired qualifying phenotypeAttest / route
BMI ≥35No additional listed complication required.Age ≥18; weight reduction/maintenance with ongoing structured nutrition and activity. New product switch requires new PA.
BMI ≥30HFpEF; or SBP >140 or DBP >90 despite 2 antihypertensives; or CKD stage ≥3a.
BMI ≥27Prediabetes; or prior MI; prior stroke; or symptomatic PAD.
Use ordinary Part D, not Bridge, for a coverable indication: T2D; Zepbound for moderate-severe OSA; Wegovy for established-CVD MACE reduction; or Wegovy injection for noncirrhotic MASH F2-F3. If nonformulary, use the Part D exception/appeal process. Broad Part D obesity coverage was not finalized for CY2026.
3

Denial → correction → appeal

quote the actual criterion
ReadCoverage exclusion vs missing data vs step therapy vs quantity/channel. Ask for policy version/date and the exact unmet clause.
CorrectResubmit missing baseline BMI, objective complication evidence, program dates, prior trials, dose/presentation, or no-duplication attestation.
AppealQuote label + plan criterion, attach matched evidence, request peer-to-peer/formulary exception, then external review where available; expedite only when criteria fit.
Preserve continuityConfirm stock, pharmacy channel and copay before each escalation; do not miscode obesity as diabetes or silently swap brand/formulation.
4

Set goals that change disease

not scale-only
TargetAgree on weight/waist and the complication to improve: BP, glycemia, OSA, HF symptoms, mobility, pain, fertility, or MASH.
Protect lean massProgressive resistance exercise 2-3 d/wk, adequate energy/protein, and frailty screening; individualize for CKD.
MeasureWeight, waist, BP/orthostasis, pulse, A1c/glucose, symptoms, intake, strength/function, adverse effects, medication possession.
Plan chronic careStopping commonly causes regain. Define maintenance, access fallback, pregnancy/procedure plan, and next titration date before starting.
START · RISK · LIPIDS · BP · OBESITY + OSA · PEOPLE · ONCOLOGY · ASCVD · FOLLOW-UP · EVIDENCE
Screening is not diagnosis. Ask snoring, witnessed apnea, choking, nonrestorative sleep, sleepiness/drowsy driving, nocturia, morning headache, and insomnia in obesity, resistant HTN, AF, HF, CAD/stroke, pulmonary HTN, T2D, or bariatric candidates.
1

Test the right patient the right way

comprehensive sleep evaluation first
Test laneUseNext step
PolysomnographyDiagnostic standard; prefer with significant cardiorespiratory disease, neuromuscular weakness, awake/suspected hypoventilation, chronic opioids, prior stroke, or severe insomnia.Split-night only when adequate diagnostic time and titration criteria are met.
Home sleep apnea testAcceptable in an uncomplicated adult with signs/symptoms suggesting moderate-severe OSA.Negative, inconclusive, or technically inadequate HSAT with ongoing suspicion → PSG; never diagnose from a questionnaire alone.
Interpret beyond AHIMild 5-14.9; moderate 15-29.9; severe ≥30 events/h. Review oxygen nadir/hypoxic burden, position/REM, central fraction, sleepiness, arrhythmia, and comorbidity.AHI is one severity axis; safety-critical sleepiness and profound hypoxemia accelerate treatment.
2

Prescribe PAP as a supported intervention

device + interface + follow-up
InitiateHome APAP or in-lab titration for uncomplicated OSA; ongoing fixed CPAP or APAP. PAP is strongly recommended for excessive sleepiness.
Order completelyDiagnosis/test, CPAP/APAP mode and range/pressure, patient-chosen interface, heated humidification/tubing, supplies, education, remote-data access.
BPAPNot routine first-line OSA. Consider without backup when therapeutic CPAP pressure is ineffective or intolerable despite mask/pressure optimization; backup rate is not for pure OSA.
First 2-4 weeksReview hours and all-night use, residual AHI, leak, pressure, symptoms, side effects, and drowsy driving; intervene early, not at annual follow-up.
3

Medicare PAP coverage clock

payer threshold ≠ clinical goal
QualifyAHI/RDI ≥15; or 5-14 with sleepiness, impaired cognition, mood disorder/insomnia, HTN, ischemic heart disease, or prior stroke.Clinical evaluation before testing, valid ordered test and supplier education. Confirm Medicare scoring: hypopneas require ≥4% desaturation and RERAs are excluded.
Continue after 12wkPractitioner re-evaluation no sooner than day 31 and no later than day 91: improved symptoms and objective PAP ≥4h/night on 70% of nights in one consecutive 30-d window during first 3mo.The 4-h rule is a coverage threshold; prescribe use for the entire sleep period.
If initial trial failsTo requalify: in-person re-evaluation identifying failure cause plus repeat facility Type-I sleep test.Do not wait for denial: schedule data review and re-evaluation when equipment is dispensed.
Cardiovascular boundary: PAP improves AHI, sleepiness, quality of life and modestly lowers BP, but SAVE (mean use 3.3 h/night) did not reduce events in nonsleepy established CVD: 17.0% vs 15.4%, HR 1.10. Treat OSA for its established benefits; do not promise universal MACE prevention.
4

Read the PAP download in sequence

use pattern before pressure change
1 · ExposureNight-by-night use, all-night coverage, naps/travel, removal time, and whether symptoms occur during untreated sleep.
2 · LeakPattern and magnitude, mouth leak, interface/position, humidification, cushion/tubing age, and whether reported events are reliable.
3 · EventsResidual AHI trend and obstructive versus central pattern; relate to position, REM, pressure and symptoms—never treat one device number alone.
4 · PressureMedian/upper pressure, range limits, flow limitation, aerophagia, awakenings, and whether fixed/APAP settings match the phenotype.
5 · Patient resultSleepiness, drowsy driving, insomnia, BP, nocturia, partner report, oxygen concern, and ability to use PAP for the whole sleep period.
6 · Close loopChange one or two correctable factors, name the owner, review remotely in days to weeks, and repeat objective testing when physiology or treatment changes.
START · RISK · LIPIDS · BP · OBESITY + OSA · PEOPLE · ONCOLOGY · ASCVD · FOLLOW-UP · EVIDENCE
"CPAP intolerant" is a problem list, not an endpoint. Identify interface, pressure, nasal, behavioral, positional, central-event, or access failure; optimize promptly, then choose an evidence-based alternative with objective follow-up.
1

Fix the common PAP failure modes

download before guessing
ProblemFirst movesEscalate when
Leak / mouth leakObserve fit and sleep position; refit size/style, replace cushion, nasal pillows vs nasal mask, chin support or full-face when indicated; avoid overtightening.Persistent large leak, skin injury, dry mouth, or high residual AHI despite fit correction.
Dryness / congestionHeated humidification/tube, saline, treat rhinitis, check oral leak and room humidity.Structural nasal obstruction, recurrent epistaxis, or inability to use nasal interface.
Pressure / aerophagiaRamp/expiratory relief, review APAP range and positional events; gradual desensitization while awake.Persistent intolerance or ineffective CPAP after optimal settings/interface → titration/BPAP assessment.
Residual eventsConfirm use, leak, event type, position and pressure; do not treat device-reported AHI in isolation.Central events, hypoventilation/hypoxemia, symptoms, or AHI still high → sleep specialist and PSG/titration.
Behavior / accessEducation, motivational/troubleshooting intervention, early telemonitoring, partner support; resolve cost/supplies and drowsy-driving safety.Document attempted optimization before declaring intolerance or seeking device authorization.
2

Non-PAP and surgical pathways

verify response with sleep testing
Oral applianceCustom, titratable mandibular advancement device by a qualified dentist when CPAP-intolerant or patient prefers alternate therapy; sleep physician oversight and follow-up testing.Dental/TMJ/occlusal follow-up; CPAP usually lowers AHI/raises O₂ more.
Positional / adjunctsPosition-dependent OSA: structured positional device, nasal/tonsil therapy when relevant; verify efficacy. Avoid alcohol/sedatives and treat insomnia.Adjunct or selected phenotype - not an untested replacement for effective PAP.
Weight pharmacotherapyZepbound 10/15 mg for moderate-severe OSA + obesity: AHI difference -20.0/-23.8 events/h at 52wk.Trials did not establish when to stop PAP. Consider PSG/HSAT after a 10–20% weight change when it will change management. Confirm control before stopping PAP.
Surgical referralDiscuss sleep surgeon if BMI <40 and PAP intolerant/unaccepting; bariatric surgeon if BMI ≥35. PAP remains initial therapy even with major anatomy in most adults.Nasal/tonsil/palatal/tongue-base surgery or MMA by anatomy; objective post-treatment test.
3

Document a complete nonimplant trial

optimization before abandonment
PAP exposureObjective use and all-night pattern, leak, residual events, pressure/interface changes, education/telemonitoring and the remaining failure mechanism.
Adjunct matchPosition, nasal obstruction, insomnia, sedatives/alcohol, weight trajectory, dentition/TMJ and whether the alternative treats the dominant anatomy.
SafetyDrowsy driving, profound hypoxemia, cardiopulmonary disease, central events or hypoventilation may make an unverified alternative unsafe.
VerificationSymptoms alone are insufficient: name the follow-up PSG/HSAT, oxygen assessment when indicated, adherence check and rescue plan.
Continue to implantable therapy on P.14 only after the PAP record, anatomy, objective severity, weight/medical options, payer criteria, interaction/MRI issues, and follow-up capacity are assembled.
START · RISK · LIPIDS · BP · OBESITY + OSA · PEOPLE · ONCOLOGY · ASCVD · FOLLOW-UP · EVIDENCE
An implant is a longitudinal therapy, not a one-time procedure. Match device label, airway/anatomy, PAP history, payer criteria, surgical risk and follow-up capacity; then activate, titrate and prove efficacy objectively.
1

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation: label vs coverage

cutting-edge devices
SystemFDA laneAccess boundary
Inspire UASAdult ≥22, AHI 15-100, PAP failure/intolerance, no complete concentric palatal collapse; FDA BMI warning upper limit 40.Medicare LCD example (L38310): age ≥22, BMI <35, PSG AHI 15-65 within 24mo, central/mixed <25%, documented optimized PAP failure/intolerance, and DISE without complete concentric collapse. Verify the applicable Medicare contractor, commercial policy and exact device. FDA approval does not establish coverage.
FDA 2025 Genio 2.1Bilateral HNS; adult ≥22, AHI 15-65 after failure/intolerance/ineligibility for lifestyle, PAP/BPAP, oral appliance, and pharmacotherapy.
FDA Mar 2026 aura6000Proximal HNS; adult moderate-severe OSA, AHI 15-65, after failure/intolerance/ineligibility for PAP, oral appliance, or pharmacotherapy.
2

Build the candidacy packet

select · authorize · coordinate
PhenotypeSeverity, central fraction, hypoxemia, BMI/weight trajectory, position, symptoms, cardiopulmonary disease and treatment goal.
AirwayNasal/tonsil/palatal/tongue-base anatomy, DISE pattern when required, dentition/TMJ, prior surgery and realistic modality match.
PAP recordObjective use/download, interface and pressure optimization, education/telemonitoring attempts, reason for failure and whether BPAP/titration was assessed.
CompatibilityMRI conditions, cardiac/other implants, surgical/anesthesia risk, occupation, travel, dexterity, charging/remote needs and payer channel.
3

Implant → activation → verified outcome

authorization is not success
Before implantConfirm device-specific label and payer rule, DISE/anatomy, PAP record, comorbidity/surgical risk, MRI/interaction constraints, patient expectations and responsible teams.
Procedure / woundDocument implant model/components, operative issues, wound/nerve function, pain/infection plan, activity restrictions and urgent device/surgical symptoms.
ActivationName activation date and clinician; teach remote/charging, sleep-time use, amplitude range and discomfort troubleshooting. A dormant implant provides no therapy.
TitrationStepwise setting adjustment using adherence, symptoms, snoring/partner report and device data; address insomnia, position, weight and adjunctive anatomy rather than simply increasing output.
Efficacy testRepeat PSG/HSAT at the appropriate interval; document AHI/hypoxemia, symptoms, BP/safety, nightly use and need for adjunct or rescue PAP.
Long termAnnual sleep/device follow-up, battery/component planning, MRI/other-procedure precautions, weight/anatomy changes, adverse effects and objective retesting when response changes.
Close the device loop: approval → implant → activation → titration → objective efficacy → durable nightly use. Keep PAP available when the implant/alternative does not adequately control OSA or hypoxemia.
START · RISK · LIPIDS · BP · CKM · PEOPLE · ONCOLOGY · ASCVD · FOLLOW-UP · EVIDENCE
Prevent without obstructing cancer care. Establish baseline risk, anticipate exposure-specific toxicity, treat modifiable risk early, and share hold/resume decisions with oncology/cardio-oncology. “Permissive cardiotoxicity” still requires surveillance and ownership.
1

Before therapy

one baseline dataset
ClinicalBP · symptomsCVD/HF, exam, tobacco, function, pregnancy, prior therapy.
MetabolicLipids · A1ceGFR + UACR, electrolytes; optimize direct indications.
CardiacECG · echoEcho for high-risk exposure/patient; troponin/NP selectively.
ExposureDrug · RT fieldDose, schedule, prior anthracycline/chest radiation, interactions.
2

Exposure → prevention focus

monitor early
ExposureCV signalAction
VEGF inhibitor / TKIEarly HTN, LV dysfunction, ischemia/thrombosis, QT depending on agent.Home BP daily in the first VEGFi cycle and after dose increases, then every 2–3 weeks. Reassess BP drugs when VEGFi stops. Choose ACEi/ARB ± a dihydropyridine CCB as indicated and check drug interactions.
BTK inhibitorHTN, AF, bleeding, ventricular arrhythmia/HF signal.BP + rhythm surveillance; antithrombotic/interaction review; coordinate agent selection.
Abiraterone · steroids · ADTHTN, fluid/electrolyte change, diabetes, obesity, dyslipidemia.BP, K, weight/edema, glucose and lipids; treat CKM risk prospectively.
Anthracycline / HER2LV dysfunction/HF.Risk-tier surveillance; optimize BP/CAD/HF therapy. New symptoms/troponin/echo change → cardio-oncology pathway.
ICIMyocarditis, myositis, conduction disease, arrhythmia; often early.Chest pain, dyspnea, weakness, ptosis, palpitations/syncope → urgent ECG, troponin, CK and specialist pathway; not routine prevention follow-up.
Chest radiationAccelerated CAD, valvular, pericardial, myocardial and vascular disease—risk rises with dose and time.Document dose/field/age; lifelong risk-factor control and exposure/symptom-directed surveillance.
3

BP, lipids & ownership

coordinate holds
Severe therapy-associated BPFor SBP ≥180 or DBP ≥110, assess acute organ injury and obtain urgent multidisciplinary review. Defer or temporarily withhold culprit therapy until SBP <160 and DBP <100, with a documented oncology/cardio-oncology restart plan.
Lipid therapyContinue indicated therapy unless contraindicated. Cancer alone is not a universal statin indication, but selected high cardiotoxicity-risk patients may merit specialist-directed statin consideration.
InteractionsPravastatin, rosuvastatin, and pitavastatin often have fewer CYP interactions, yet transporter effects and dose caps remain; run the specific drug pair.
SurvivorshipAnnual BP/lipid/CKM/tobacco/activity review; preserve exposure record. New symptoms trigger diagnosis, not screening reassurance.
4

Surveillance is a dated pathway

risk tier + exposure + trigger
BaselineRecord CVD/HF phenotype, BP/home cuff, ECG, lipids/A1c/eGFR/UACR, prior cardiotoxic exposure, planned agent/dose/field, symptoms, pregnancy and drug interactions.
Early cyclesUse exposure-specific BP, rhythm, ECG/echo and biomarker surveillance; new symptoms or objective change move to the toxicity pathway, not the annual-risk visit.
During therapyTrend rather than reset: weight/volume, BP, renal/electrolytes, glucose/lipids, rhythm, function and treatment dose. Share any hold threshold and resumption owner.
Treatment transitionReconcile discontinued/continuing therapies, reverse temporary holds, document cumulative exposure, and transfer the next surveillance date explicitly.
SurvivorshipAnnual conventional prevention plus exposure- and symptom-directed evaluation; chest radiation, anthracycline/HER2 and vascular/metabolic therapies create different timelines.
Shared decision line: oncology owns cancer efficacy; cardiology/cardio-oncology owns the CV assessment and treatment recommendation; the hold/resume decision is multidisciplinary and documented.
START · RISK · LIPIDS · BP · CKM · PEOPLE · ONCOLOGY · ASCVD · FOLLOW-UP · EVIDENCE
Secondary prevention is phenotype-specific. Close LDL, BP, tobacco, CKM, rehabilitation, and adherence gaps in every patient; then choose antithrombotic and residual-risk layers by CAD, stroke, PAD, bleeding risk, and concurrent anticoagulation.
1

Core stack

close gaps quickly
DomainTarget / treatmentBoundary
Atherogenic lipidsHigh-intensity/max tolerated statin; LDL <70 if ASCVD not very high risk; <55 / non-HDL <85 if very high risk. Add ezetimibe then PCSK9-directed therapy by gap.Do not apply <55 automatically to every ASCVD phenotype; do not wait through serial weak steps after recurrence.
BPUsually <130/80; ACEi/ARB with albuminuric CKD, diabetes, CAD/HF; β-blocker only for current indication.Orthostasis, kidney/electrolyte safety, angina/low DBP, frailty.
CKMSGLT2/GLP-1/finerenone/obesity therapy by proven phenotype; eGFR + UACR.Do not choose by A1c alone or extrapolate a class outcome to every agent.
RehabilitationCardiac rehab after MI/PCI/CABG; supervised/structured exercise for PAD; stroke rehabilitation; tobacco treatment.Referral is not completion—confirm attendance and barriers.
2

Antithrombotic by phenotype

indication + stop date
Chronic CAD · no OACUsually single antiplatelet; selected high-ischemic/low-bleeding-risk CAD/PAD may use rivaroxaban 2.5 mg BID + aspirin.
Post-ACS / PCIDAPT agent and duration by ischemic/bleeding risk, stent/ACS context, and current guideline; document de-escalation/stop date.
Noncardioembolic stroke/TIAAntiplatelet strategy by mechanism and time window; short DAPT only for eligible early minor stroke/high-risk TIA. OCEANIC-STROKE is a new 2026 result, but indication/regulatory guidance must be followed.
Symptomatic PAD / revascularizationAntiplatelet + structured exercise/foot care; consider vascular-dose rivaroxaban + aspirin when ischemic benefit exceeds bleeding risk.
AF / other OAC indicationAnticoagulant strategy supersedes routine aspirin; shorten combined therapy when possible using the exact coronary/stroke indication.
3

Selected residual-risk layers

after the foundation
Icosapent ethylREDUCE-IT enrolled TG 135–499. US risk-reduction labeling starts at TG ≥150 with CVD or diabetes + ≥2 CV risk factors on maximal tolerated statin. EPA 2 g BID, with AF/bleeding review.
Colchicine 0.5 mg/dOptional selected stable CAD layer after standard prevention. Avoid severe renal/hepatic impairment and strong CYP3A4/P-gp inhibitors; review CBC/interactions.
PAD foot / limbFoot inspection, pulses, wounds/infection, protective footwear, structured walking, diabetes/tobacco care; urgent pathway for acute limb ischemia or CLTI.
Never stack blindlyAspirin + DAPT + anticoagulation requires a defined indication, owner, duration, gastroprotection/bleeding plan, and stop date.
4

Secondary-prevention visit close

recurrence exposes open loops
LDL laneCurrent/untreated LDL, risk category, goal, expected combination effect, adherence/access, and recheck date.
Antithrombotic laneExact vascular and OAC indication, agent(s), bleeding risk, gastroprotection, duration, de-escalation and stop date.
BP + CKM laneValidated home average, standing safety, eGFR/UACR, K/volume, diabetes/HF/CKD layers, and next lab.
Recovery laneCardiac/stroke/PAD rehabilitation attendance, activity prescription, tobacco treatment, foot/limb or neurologic safety, function and mood.
Residual-risk laneTG/EPA phenotype, selected stable-CAD colchicine, obesity/OSA, inflammation, and recurrent-event mechanism—only after the core stack.
Ownership laneWho closes each gap, what data return, the next escalation if off goal, and the date—not “follow up with cardiology.”
START · RISK · LIPIDS · BP · CKM · PEOPLE · ONCOLOGY · ASCVD · FOLLOW-UP · EVIDENCE
A prescription without a monitoring date is an open loop. Shorten the interval for CKD, older age/frailty, multiple simultaneous changes, abnormal baseline labs, diuretics, interacting drugs, or symptoms.
1

Therapy monitoring matrix

baseline · first check · later · hold/refer
ChangeBaselineFirst checkLaterHold / refer
Statin / nonstatinLipids, ALT; CK if indicated.Lipids 4–12 wk; symptoms.Every 3–12 mo.Severe weakness, marked CK, liver injury; pregnancy review.
ACEi / ARBK, creatinine/eGFR, volume.~1–2 wk if high risk; no later than 2–4 wk.After titration; periodic.Significant hyperK/AKI, symptomatic hypotension, pregnancy.
Thiazide / loopNa, K, creatinine, volume, uric acid context.1–2 wk.After titration; periodic.Major electrolyte/volume issue, gout complication.
Spironolactone / finerenoneK, eGFR, interactions.Spironolactone: K within 1 wk after start/titration. Finerenone: K/eGFR at 4 wk. Earlier checks if high risk.About q4 mo or risk/label-based.K/eGFR threshold, interacting strong inhibitor, acute illness.
SGLT2 inhibitoreGFR, volume, DKA/infection risk.Early clinical/volume check.Kidney/volume, sick-day review.Fasting/surgery, acute illness, suspected DKA.
GLP-1 / obesity drugWeight/waist, BP/pulse, GI/gallbladder/pancreas, retinopathy, pregnancy.Each titration.At least q3 mo once stable.Persistent vomiting/dehydration, pancreatitis concern, unsafe/ineffective therapy.
AntithromboticIndication, CBC, renal/liver function, bleeding/drug interactions.Early adherence/bleeding check.Each visit; renal interval by drug/risk.Major bleeding, unexplained anemia, unsafe stacking.
2

Visit cadence

ownership by date
~1 monthBP medication start/intensification; home-log review; symptoms, adherence, labs, dose step.
4–12 weeksLipid start/change; compare expected vs observed response, adherence, access, adverse effects; add therapy if off goal.
Each titrationWeight/GLP-1 therapy; nutrition, hydration, GI symptoms, muscle/function, hypoglycemia-prone drugs, affordability.
Every stable visitMedication possession, refill gap, home BP upload, tobacco, activity, sleep, mood, access, shared decision, stop dates.
One-line close Today I started/changed ____ · expected effect ____ · warning symptoms ____ · labs on ____ · home data by ____ · dose decision on ____ · next visit ____ · owner ____
Escalate instead of repeating. Persistent uncontrolled BP, LDL far above goal, recurrent events, severe TG/FH, progressive CKD/albuminuria, medication intolerance, or complex oncology/pregnancy interactions warrants specialist/pharmacist/team escalation.
3

Abnormal first check → named response

do not file and forget
Effect smaller than expectedConfirm possession, dose, timing, technique and interacting causes; resolve access/adherence, then intensify rather than repeating the same plan.
K/creatinine/Na changeAssess volume, illness, NSAIDs/supplements and interacting drugs; compare with baseline and the agent-specific threshold before hold, dose change or recheck.
Orthostasis / volume lossStanding vitals, intake/GI loss, diuretic and BP burden; protect organ-benefit therapy when possible by removing the least necessary contributor.
GI intolerance / weight lossSlow escalation, nutrition/hydration/constipation plan, review lean-mass risk and hypoglycemia-prone drugs; urgent symptoms exit the routine pathway.
Bleeding / anemiaAssess severity/source, CBC/renal/liver function and all antithrombotics/NSAIDs; preserve only therapies with a current indication and explicit duration.
START · RISK · LIPIDS · BP · CKM · PEOPLE · ONCOLOGY · ASCVD · FOLLOW-UP · EVIDENCE
Practice-changing trials — checked October 17, 2026. Match phenotype, comparator, absolute benefit, harms and background therapy. Follow-up is median unless labeled mean.
A

Blood pressure & lipids

peer-reviewed outcomes
TrialPopulation / comparisonResultBoundary
SPRINT9,361 · high risk without diabetes/prior stroke. SBP <120 vs <140.1.65 vs 2.19/100 person-y, HR 0.75. Mortality HR 0.73. 3.26 y.Standardized BP. More hypotension, electrolyte abnormality and AKI.
ESPRIT11,255 · high-risk HTN including diabetes/prior stroke. SBP <120 vs <140.9.7% vs 11.1%, HR 0.88. 3.4 y.Broader than SPRINT. More syncope.
BPROAD12,821 · T2D + elevated CV risk. SBP <120 vs <140.1.65 vs 2.09/100 person-y, HR 0.79. 4.2 y.Selected diabetes. More symptomatic hypotension and hyperkalemia.
CLEAR Outcomes13,970 · statin-intolerant ASCVD/high risk. Bempedoic acid.11.7% vs 13.3%, HR 0.87. 40.6 mo.More gout/cholelithiasis. Retain a tolerated statin.
VESALIUS-CV12,257 · atherosclerosis/high-risk diabetes without prior MI/stroke, LDL ≥90. Evolocumab.5-y MACE-3 estimates 6.2% vs 8.0%, HR 0.75. Follow-up 4.6 y.Kaplan–Meier estimates in selected high-risk adults.
REDUCE-IT8,179 · statin-treated ASCVD or diabetes + risk, TG 135–499. Icosapent ethyl 2 g BID.17.2% vs 22.0%, HR 0.75. 4.9 y.More AF/flutter hospitalization. Serious bleeding 2.7% vs 2.1% (P=0.06).
B

Inflammation, HIV & antithrombotics

indication matters
REPRIEVE7,769 · ART-treated HIV, low/moderate risk. Pitavastatin 4 mg.4.81 vs 7.32 MACE/1,000 person-y, HR 0.65. 5.1 y.Check ART interactions. Modest muscle/diabetes excess.
LoDoCo2 / CLEAR SYNERGYStable CAD (N=5,522) vs acute MI (N=7,062). Colchicine 0.5 mg daily.Stable CAD HR 0.69 over 28.6 mo. Acute MI HR 0.99 over 3 y.Context-specific. Routine acute-MI use not supported.
COMPASS27,395 across 3 arms. Stable CAD/PAD. Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg BID + aspirin vs aspirin.MACE 4.1% vs 5.4%, HR 0.76. Major bleed 3.1% vs 1.9%. Mean 23 mo.High ischemic / low bleeding risk only.
OCEANIC-STROKE12,327 · recent noncardioembolic stroke/high-risk TIA. Asundexian on antiplatelet therapy.Ischemic stroke 6.2% vs 8.4%, HR 0.74. Major bleed 1.9% vs 1.7%, HR 1.10 (95% CI 0.85–1.44).Stroke phenotype only. Does not establish AF use or a class effect.
Evidence labels Peer-reviewed outcome benefit ≠ regulatory indication ≠ guideline recommendation. Confirm all three when the result is new.
C

Translate a trial in four passes

effect size is not the whole answer
Population matchEntry criteria, baseline event risk, excluded phenotypes, run-in, background therapy, setting, follow-up and discontinuation.
EffectAbsolute event rates, time horizon, HR/RR with confidence interval, competing outcomes, components and recurrent versus first events.
HarmsAbsolute adverse-event excess, discontinuation, bleeding/infection/metabolic injury, monitoring burden and interaction with comorbidity.
ImplementationRegulatory indication, guideline status, dose/product, access, feasibility, patient goal and whether the comparator still reflects current care.
D

Write the bedside translation

one sentence, all boundaries
Benefit“In patients like ____ on ____ background therapy, ____ changed ____ from ____ to ____ over ____.”
Harm“The main tradeoff was ____ (absolute excess ____), plus monitoring/access burden ____.”
Decision“This supports ____ product/dose for ____ indication. It does not establish ____.”
START · RISK · LIPIDS · BP · CKM · PEOPLE · ONCOLOGY · ASCVD · FOLLOW-UP · EVIDENCE
CKM evidence — checked October 17, 2026. Separate placebo superiority from active-comparator noninferiority, kidney composites from MACE, and weight/biomarker change from dedicated event reduction. Follow-up is median unless labeled mean.
A

Diabetes, kidney & obesity

match the phenotype
TrialPopulationResultBoundary
SELECT17,604 · BMI ≥27 + CVD without diabetes. Semaglutide 2.4 mg weekly.MACE 6.5% vs 8.0%, HR 0.80. Mean 39.8 mo.Secondary prevention. Permanent AE discontinuation 16.6% vs 8.2%.
FLOW3,533 · T2D + albuminuric CKD. Semaglutide 1 mg weekly.Kidney/CV-death HR 0.76, MACE HR 0.82, all-cause death HR 0.80. 3.4 y.Use CKD foundation. Not all CKD phenotypes enrolled.
SOUL9,650 · T2D + ASCVD and/or CKD. Oral semaglutide.MACE 12.0% vs 13.8%, HR 0.86. 49.5 mo.Direct oral GLP-1 outcome evidence in high-risk T2D.
SURPASS-CVOT13,299 randomized, 13,165 modified ITT. T2D + ASCVD. Tirzepatide vs dulaglutide.MACE 12.2% vs 13.1%, HR 0.92 (95.3% CI 0.83–1.01).Noninferiority met. Superiority to dulaglutide not established (P=0.09).
DAPA-CKD4,304 · albuminuric CKD ± diabetes. Dapagliflozin.Kidney/CV-death composite 9.2% vs 14.5%, HR 0.61. 2.4 y.Benefit with and without diabetes. This is not MACE.
EMPA-KIDNEY6,609 · broad CKD ± diabetes. Empagliflozin.Kidney progression/CV death 13.1% vs 16.9%, HR 0.72. 2.0 y.Broader eGFR/albuminuria spectrum.
FIDELITY13,026 · T2D + CKD. Finerenone pooled analysis.CV composite 12.7% vs 14.4%, HR 0.86. 3.0 y.Albuminuric CKD on RAAS blockade. Monitor K/eGFR.
B

Negative boundaries & implementation

what not to promise
ASPREE / ASCEND / ARRIVEPrimary-prevention aspirin has no broad net benefit. Small vascular benefit may be offset by bleeding.No routine aspirin. Individualize exceptional use.
DAPA-MI / EMPACT-MIDAPA-MI excluded prior diabetes/chronic HF. EMPACT-MI enrolled increased HF risk after MI, with or without diabetes.Neither established universal post-MI hard-outcome benefit. Treat separate HF/CKD/T2D indications.
SECURE2,499 after MI. Aspirin/ramipril/atorvastatin polypill vs usual care.9.5% vs 12.7%, HR 0.76 over 36 mo. Strategy improved outcomes and adherence.
Five-check translation Match population · compare absolute benefit · quantify harms · identify comparator/background therapy · solve feasibility/access. Biomarker lowering alone is not event reduction.
C

Make the five checks visible

before adding a layer
1 · PopulationSame disease stage, albuminuria/eGFR, diabetes/CVD/HF status, BMI, age, exclusions and baseline absolute risk?
2 · ComparatorPlacebo, usual care or active drug? Was contemporary RAAS/SGLT2/statin/antithrombotic therapy present and balanced?
3 · EndpointMACE, kidney failure/CV death composite, HF events, weight, A1c or biomarker? First event or recurrent events?
4 · Benefit + harmAbsolute difference and duration, confidence interval, discontinuation and the adverse event that matters to this patient.
5 · Use nowExact agent/product/dose, FDA indication, guideline position, monitoring, interaction, access and patient goal.
Hard boundaryNoninferiority is not superiority. A class cousin is not the tested molecule. A kidney or weight endpoint is not automatically MACE.
D

Common inference errors

stop before extrapolation
Surrogate → eventLDL, BP, UACR, A1c, weight or inflammatory-marker improvement may justify an approved surrogate indication. It does not create an untested event claim.
Composite → every componentA positive composite does not prove each component. Inspect event counts, hierarchy, multiplicity and whether one component drove the result.
Selected → universalEnrichment, adherence run-in, specialist follow-up and narrow phenotype can raise benefit and lower apparent implementation burden.
Negative → never usefulA neutral outcome trial can still define a boundary. Treat the separate HF/CKD/T2D/weight indication when it is independently proven.
START · RISK · LIPIDS · BP · CKM · PEOPLE · ONCOLOGY · ASCVD · FOLLOW-UP · EVIDENCE
Registry and evidence check — October 17, 2026. Primary completion (PC) dates are estimates unless labeled actual. Registry results, sponsor toplines and published papers are separate evidence states.
A

Registry status & recent outcomes

status is not an outcome
Trial · NCTPopulation / NStatus / PCEvidence / outcome question
Lp(a)HORIZONNCT04023552 · pelacarsenCVD + Lp(a) ≥70 mg/dL. N=8,323.Completed
Jul 16, 2026 actual
Sponsor topline Sep 4: primary expanded-MACE endpoint not met. Full event/safety data pending.
ZEUSNCT05021835 · ziltivekimabASCVD + CKD + hsCRP ≥2 mg/L. N=6,385.Completed
Jun 9, 2026 actual
Sponsor topline Jul 31: MACE HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.88–1.11), more serious infections. Full report pending.
ORION-4NCT03705234 · inclisiranPrior MI, ischemic stroke or PAD. N=16,124.Active, not recruiting
Oct 2026 est.
Does twice-yearly PCSK9 siRNA reduce MACE?
PREVAILNCT05202509 · obicetrapibASCVD with LDL inadequately controlled. N=9,541.Active, not recruiting
Nov 2026 est.
CETP inhibition and CV death/MI/stroke/revascularization. Date is not a promised readout.
HERMESNCT05636176 · ziltivekimabHFmrEF/HFpEF + hsCRP ≥2 mg/L. N=4,874.Terminated
Sep 3, 2026 actual
No registry results. Registry stop wording does not establish an efficacy conclusion.
REDEFINE 3NCT05669755 · CagriSemaAge ≥55, BMI ≥25, CVD ± T2D. N=7,101.Active, not recruiting
Sep 2027 est.
CV outcomes for semaglutide + cagrilintide.
VICTORION-2PNCT05030428 · inclisiranCVD with LDL ≥70 mg/dL. N=17,004.Active, not recruiting
May 2027 est.
Independent secondary-prevention MACE test.
SURMOUNT-MMONCT05556512 · tirzepatideBMI ≥27 + CVD or enriched primary-prevention risk. N=15,374.Active, not recruiting
Oct 2027 est.
Death, atherothrombotic and HF outcomes in selected high-risk adults.
Do now
Use approved/outcomes-proven therapies in their current indication. Control LDL, BP, CKM risk, tobacco, activity, sleep and access.
Wait for
Peer-reviewed events, absolute harms/benefits, subgroup consistency, regulatory indication and implementation guidance.
B

Near-term status ledger: evidence-gated

completed or available ≠ MACE benefit
State / trialQuestionCurrent boundary
COMPLETED · SYNCHRONIZE-CVOTNCT06077864 · Jun 1, 2026 actualSurvodutide CV safety. BMI ≥27 + CVD or ≥2 risk factors, or BMI ≥30 + CVD/CKD or ≥2 factors. N=5,531.No registry results. Sponsor Oct 1 expected results later in 2026. Weight efficacy does not answer CV outcomes.
COMPLETED · LIBREXIA-ACSNCT05754957 · Feb 6, 2026 actualMilvexian + antiplatelet therapy after ACS. N=14,194. Median follow-up 12.2 mo.Published neutral result: MACE 5.4% vs 5.1%, HR 1.05 (95% CI 0.91–1.21).
ACTIVE, NOT RECRUITING · LIBREXIA-STROKENCT05702034 · Oct 15, 2026 est.Milvexian after ischemic stroke/high-risk TIA. N=12,523.No registry results. OCEANIC-STROKE does not establish a factor-XIa class effect.
AVAILABLE · EnlicitideFDA-approved oral PCSK9 for LDL lowering.CORALreef event trial pending.
AVAILABLE · InclisiranFDA-approved LDL lowering.ORION-4 and VICTORION event trials pending.
AVAILABLE · OrforglipronFDA-approved oral obesity therapy.No dedicated MACE-reduction claim.
AVAILABLE · BaxdrostatFDA-approved add-on BP therapy.Label lacks controlled CV-event reduction trials.
Interpretation: no ClinicalTrials.gov results does not mean no published results. Topline announcements require full event and safety data. A neutral result for one agent does not settle the entire mechanism.
START · RISK · LIPIDS · BP · CKM · PEOPLE · ONCOLOGY · ASCVD · FOLLOW-UP · EVIDENCE
Outcomes pipeline — checked October 17, 2026. Dates are estimated primary completion, not promised results. Separate approved indications from investigational use, and clinical events from biomarker change.
A

Active, not recruiting

outcomes pending
TrialPopulation / interventionPrimary completionClinical question
OCEAN(a)-OutcomesNCT05581303Prior MI or PCI + risk factor, Lp(a) ≥200 nmol/L. Olpasiran. N=7,297.Mar 2028Time to first CHD death, MI or urgent coronary revascularization.
EASi-KIDNEYNCT06531824Progressive CKD ± T2D. Aldosterone-synthase inhibition + empagliflozin. N=8,371.Dec 2026Registry active, not recruiting. No results. Sep 15 sponsor update body not verified in this review.
TRIUMPH-OutcomesNCT06383390BMI ≥27 + ASCVD and/or CKD ± T2D. retatrutide. N≈10,000.Feb 2029CV death/MI/stroke/HF and kidney outcomes.
ACCLAIM-Lp(a)NCT06292013Lp(a) ≥175 nmol/L + ASCVD or high first-event risk. Lepodisiran. N≈17,300.Mar 2029Time to first MACE-4 after randomization.
VICTORION-1 PREVENTNCT05739383High-risk adults without prior major event. inclisiran. N=14,012.Apr 2029Does inclisiran prevent first major ASCVD events?
CORALreef OutcomesNCT06008756High CV risk. Oral enlicitide. N≈14,550.Nov 2029MACE-plus includes limb ischemia/amputation and urgent arterial revascularization.
B

Recruiting

mechanism to hard outcomes
MARITIME-CVNCT07037433ASCVD + overweight/obesity. Maridebart cafraglutide. N≈12,800.Jun 2028MACE-3 and expanded five-component CV endpoint, with long-term safety.
ZENITHNCT07181109High CV risk + uncontrolled HTN on ≥2 drugs including a diuretic. Zilebesiran q6mo. N≈11,000.Sep 2030Hard-outcome test of RNAi BP lowering.
Do not prescribe a mechanism. Lp(a), IL-6, aldosterone synthase, RNAi BP, triple incretin and oral PCSK9 biology may be compelling. Practice changes after patient-important outcomes, safety, approval, and implementation—not a biomarker slide.
C

Mechanism watchlist

biomarker promise ≠ event proof
State / itemQuestion or current useBoundary
WATCH · ApoC-III / ANGPTL3Severe TG/chylomicronemia and rare lipid phenotypes.Olezarsen reduces TG and acute-pancreatitis risk in severe HTG (≥500 mg/dL). No general ASCVD indication.
WATCH · Renal denervationDurable BP lowering and medication-burden strategy.Sham-controlled BP lowering is not proof of fewer MI, stroke, HF or death.
WATCH · InflammationIL-6 inhibition, colchicine implementation, precision inflammatory phenotypes.Infection/non-CV harm and disease context can erase biomarker enthusiasm.
Cutting edge, not over the edge. Use approved/guideline-supported options with their exact evidence tier, phenotype, monitoring, interactions, cost, and patient goal. Never turn registry status, a press release, biomarker lowering, weight loss, noninferiority, or class analogy into an unearned MACE claim.