Key
decisions
Unstable?ACS, decompensated HF or unstable arrhythmia → stabilize and decide timing. Emergency surgery proceeds as required with parallel treatment.
Low-risk pathway?Low combined risk, low-risk surgery or adequate capacity with stable symptoms → usually no routine coronary testing.
A

Make the decision

six questions, one recommendation
1 · Clock + stabilityEmergency / urgent / time-sensitive / elective. Operation, harm of delay and active disease.
2 · Risk + reserveValidated estimate, valve/RV/PH/device modifiers and actual functional capacity.
3 · Test + actOrder only if a result changes treatment, timing or monitoring.
B

Proceed • optimize • defer

state the condition
  • Proceed Explain residual risk. A normal test does not guarantee an uncomplicated operation.
  • Optimize or defer Name the disease to treat, reassessment criterion and acceptable surgical window.
  • Before surgery Medication last doses, anticoagulation/PCI constraints, device plan and hemodynamic goals.
  • After surgery Monitoring, event response, restart criteria and follow-up owner.
Address independent cardiac disease even when testing stops. Open-heart surgery → Valve and CABG Workups.
Guideline currency: AHA reaffirmed the perioperative guideline in September 2026 without changing the 2024 recommendations. Dates attached to trials and other society documents remain source-specific.
Define the harm of waiting before choosing the workup.
A

How much time is available?

surgeon defines the actual deadline
UrgencyWindowAction
EmergencyUsually <2 hoursFocused assessment + stabilization while required surgery proceeds. Plan anesthesia and recovery location.
UrgentUsually 2 to <24 hoursResolve immediate threats. Avoid tests reporting after the decision deadline.
Time-sensitivePotentially up to 3 monthsName the latest acceptable date. Balance cardiac benefit against surgical harm from delay.
ElectiveTime for treatmentEvaluate and treat important disease before fixing the operative date.
  • Procedure burden Confirm approach, blood loss/fluid shifts and anesthesia.
B

Active disease changes the pathway

treat within the clock
  • ACS New/accelerating ischemic symptoms, acute ischemic ECG changes or suspected infarction.
  • Decompensated HF New congestion, resting dyspnea, hypoperfusion or deterioration from baseline.
  • Dangerous rhythm Sustained ventricular arrhythmia, high-grade block, symptomatic bradycardia or unstable tachyarrhythmia.
  • Major lesion Severe symptomatic valve disease or another hemodynamic constraint → define severity and treatment options.
C

Timing implications

acute versus stable
  • Elective Treat acute cardiac disease before proceeding when appropriate.
  • Urgent Joint stabilization-versus-delay decision with surgery/anesthesia.
  • Recent MI Review date, mechanism, treatment, symptoms and ventricular function. No universal 30-day rule.
  • Stable history Remote MI, stable HF and controlled arrhythmia do not equal active disease.
Quote the model, endpoint and time horizon. RCRI points are not a universal event percentage.
A

Risk and reserve

two different questions
Combined MACE risk
<1% / ≥1%
Low / elevated risk
Poor capacity
DASI ≤34 or <4 METs
DASI >34 supports better reserve
ModelUseLimit
RCRISix clinical predictorsCardiac-complication categories are not interchangeable with other MACE estimates.
Gupta MICAProcedure-specific MI/cardiac arrestVerify operation, functional status, ASA, age and kidney input.
ACS NSQIPCardiac + noncardiac complicationsExact procedure and inputs. Each output answers a different question.
  • RCRI inputs Ischemic heart disease, HF, cerebrovascular disease, insulin-treated diabetes, creatinine >2.0 mg/dL and qualifying high-risk surgery.
B

Interpret the patient outside the score

capacity + modifiers
  • Verify Use the validated instrument. Never impute creatinine, count all diabetes as insulin-treated or import another cohort’s event rate.
  • Capacity Actual activity, recency and limiting symptom. Knee pain means uncertain capacity, not ischemia. Avoid unsupported >4-MET claims.
  • Modifiers Severe valves, PH/RV dysfunction, recent PCI/stroke, congenital disease, device/LVAD and frailty.
  • Frailty Validated assessment in older/apparently frail patients facing elevated-risk surgery informs recovery/support.
Better DASI does not override acute symptoms or a severe lesion.
Order only when a result changes care. Define abnormal, reassuring and inconclusive result branches.
A

Choose the test

use / avoid
TestUseAvoid
ECGRelevant CVD/symptoms before elevated-risk surgery. New rhythm/ischemic concern.Routine asymptomatic low-risk screening.
TTENew dyspnea/HF, suspected new or worsening dysfunction, important valve question.Routine EF recheck in stable asymptomatic patients.
BNP/NT-proBNPSelected higher-risk patients.Coronary localization or automatic angiography.
Baseline troponinSelected risk refinement or planned injury surveillance.Single-value ACS diagnosis.
Stress imagingElevated procedural/clinical risk + poor/unknown capacity + actionable result.Age, diabetes or RCRI point alone.
CCTASelected actionable high-risk anatomy question.Universal screening or incidental-calcium reflex.
AngiographyIndependent indication or concerning finding with a treatment question.Routine preoperative step.
B

Biomarker selection

AHA/ACC
  • Candidates Elevated-risk surgery + known CVD, age ≥65, or age ≥45 with CVD symptoms. BNP/NT-proBNP reasonable, troponin optional.
BNP
>92 ng/L
Algorithm risk flag
NT-proBNP
≥300 ng/L
Algorithm risk flag
Troponin
>99th percentile
Assay upper reference limit
  • Interpretation Risk flags, not cancellation values. Review kidneys, chronic HF, rhythm and trajectory → cause, optimization and surveillance. An elevated biomarker alone does not establish obstructive CAD or require catheterization.
C

Match the modality

question + feasibility
  • Stress/CCTA branch Elevated procedural/clinical risk, poor/unknown capacity and management-changing result.
  • Choose for feasibility Exercise ability, image quality, rhythm, kidney function and expertise. Unstable patients need active-disease assessment, not routine stress testing.
Revascularization needs a clinical indication. PCI may delay the operation.
A

Treat CAD for the right reason

indication before procedure
  • Treat ACS pathway. Left-main ≥50% → consider revascularization and elective deferral.
  • Avoid Routine non-left-main intervention solely to reduce operative risk.
  • CARP 510 stable vascular-surgery patients. Mortality 22% versus 23% at 2.7 years. No postoperative MI benefit.
  • Delay 54 versus 18 days: revascularization versus no revascularization. Weigh benefit against antiplatelet-related delay.
B

Surgery after PCI

DES anchors assume ≥1 antiplatelet interruption
PCI contextTiming anchor
Balloon without stentElective delay ≥14 days
DES for ACSIdeally elective delay ≥12 months
DES for chronic CADElective delay ≥6 months reasonable
DES, time-sensitive surgeryConsider ≥3 months if delay causes more harm
BMS/DES within 30 daysElective antiplatelet interruption potentially harmful
  • Early time-sensitive surgery Within 30 days of BMS or <3 months of DES: continue DAPT unless bleeding outweighs protection.
  • Aspirin after PCI Continue low-dose aspirin if feasible. Crossing a time threshold does not eliminate thrombosis.
C

If interruption is authorized

surgery + anesthesia + interventional cardiology
  • Recovery intervals Aspirin 4 days • clopidogrel 5-7 days • prasugrel 7-10 days • ticagrelor 3-5 days. Neuraxial/deep-block rules may be longer.
  • No PCI Weigh secondary-prevention benefit against bleeding. Avoid routine initiation. POISE-2: no overall death/MI benefit, more major bleeding.
  • Handoff PCI date/indication/anatomy, agents, last doses, restart trigger/owner. Heparin cannot replace stent antiplatelet protection.
POISE-2 is not a blanket post-PCI stop rule. Populations and limits → CABG/PCI evidence.
Plan the entire gap: last dose → protection → procedure → restart.
A

Elective anticoagulant anchors

not neuraxial safety intervals
AgentInterruption / restartModifiers
Factor Xa DOACUsually omit 1 day for low/moderate, 2 days for high bleed riskMinimal risk may need less. Renal dysfunction, interactions and blocks can extend timing.
DabigatranUsually omit 1–4 daysCrCl + procedural bleeding risk
WarfarinUsually stop ~5 days, verify INRSome minor procedures permit continuation. Very high thrombosis risk needs specialist review.
DOAC restart~24 hours low/moderate, 48-72 hours high riskHemostasis, renal trajectory and catheter requirements
  • Count actual doses CHEST/PAUSE omitted days are not exact elapsed hours. Two omitted days need not equal 48 hours.
B

Bridge only when justified

indication + event date
  • Usual branch DOACs generally need no bridge. BRIDGE supports avoiding routine warfarin bridging in its AF population.
  • Limit BRIDGE does not settle mechanical valves or every very-high-risk patient.
  • Review individually Mechanical mitral/older valves, very recent stroke/systemic embolism, recent VTE or LV thrombus.
  • Guideline differences Exceptional-risk recommendations differ. Agree with anticoagulation/procedural teams rather than bridging a whole diagnostic category.
C

Apply the second clock

ASRA + anesthesia
  • Blocks/catheters Drug, dose, CrCl, needle placement, catheter removal and subsequent dosing determine neuraxial/deep plexus/peripheral-block intervals.
  • Complete order Agent/dose/indication, last doses, CrCl, bleeding risk, valve/event history, bridge if selected, procedure checks, prophylaxis and restart conditions/owner.
Antiplatelet interruption is separate. Agent-specific holds and urgent reversal → medication guide.
Indication and current physiology determine continuation. Every hold needs a restart condition.
A

Cardiovascular medications

before / after
DrugBefore surgeryReassess before dosing
Beta blockerContinue established therapy when appropriate. New indication: start optimally >7 days before, not routinely on operative day.Bradycardia, hypotension, perfusion
StatinContinue if agent, liver status and interactions permit. Start for a long-term indication.Rosuvastatin contraindicated in acute liver failure/decompensated cirrhosis
ACEi/ARBControlled hypertension + elevated-risk surgery: consider omission 24 hours before. HFrEF: continuation reasonable if tolerated.BP/perfusion, K, kidney trend
ARNIExplicit HF/anesthesia plan: indication, BP, kidneysTolerance/dose. ACEi↔ARNI switch requires 36 hours
DiureticCongestion versus depletion, fasting, anticipated shiftsExamination, I/O, weight, renal/electrolyte trends
MRAK, kidney function, anticipated instabilityContinue/restart only if K/kidneys permit
Clonidine / rate drugsPrevent withdrawal. Check additive bradycardia/hypotensionNPO route + hemodynamic tolerance
B

Evidence and exceptions

STOP-or-NOT
  • Trial 2,222 patients. Death/major postoperative complications: 22% with either ACEi/ARB strategy.
  • Hypotension Vasopressor-treated: 54% continuation versus 41% interruption. Few HF patients. No universal HFrEF/ARNI hold.
  • Source scope Beta blocker/statin/ACEi/ARB branches follow guidelines. Diuretic/MRA/ARNI orders remain individualized.
  • No reflex initiation Surgery alone does not indicate aspirin, beta blocker or clonidine. New therapy needs indication and follow-up.
Calendar last dose + physiologic restart gate + owner. Reassess after bleeding, hypotension, AKI or prolonged fasting. Details → medication guide.
Key
decisions
SGLT2 holdScheduled surgery: canagliflozin/dapagliflozin/empagliflozin ≥3 days, ertugliflozin ≥4 days. Applies to HF and diabetes.
Type 1 diabetesPreserve basal insulin during fasting. Specify dose/infusion and monitoring.
A

SGLT2: detect and recover

normal glucose does not exclude ketoacidosis
  • Urgent/incomplete hold Alert anesthesia/inpatient teams. Fasting, illness and depletion increase concern.
  • Suspected ketoacidosis Check acid-base status and ketones even without marked hyperglycemia.
  • Restart Clinical stability, reliable intake, volume/metabolic recovery, insulin delivery and resolved ketoacidosis concerns. Name owner.
  • Label gate Empagliflozin resumption requires clinical stability and resumed intake.
B

Glucose plan

ADA 2026
Perioperative glucose
100-180 mg/dL
Individualized insulin and glucose checks
Operative day
Hold oral agents
Includes metformin
  • Guidance update ADA 2026 differs from the 2024 cardiac guideline permitting metformin continuation. Reconcile with anesthesia/diabetes teams.
C

GLP-1 / dual GIP-GLP-1

aspiration risk
  • Assess Agent/dose, escalation, GI symptoms and other delayed-emptying conditions. Low-risk patients may continue under multisociety guidance.
  • Higher risk Anesthesia-led diet, fasting, ultrasound/airway or deferral plan.
  • Keep sources distinct Multisociety: selective ≥24-hour liquid diet. SPAQI continuing users: 24 hours of clear liquids plus modified liquid fasting.
  • Pitfall A weekly drug held 7 days does not establish an empty stomach.
Communicate the hemodynamic constraint, not just the EF.
A

Lesion → decision → physiology

anesthesia handoff
FindingBefore surgeryKey constraint
Decompensated HFTreat congestion/hypoperfusion. Reconsider elective timing.Current volume/perfusion, support needs, reassessment
Stable HFOptimize within the window. Plan drugs/monitoring.Baseline function, volume target, BP tolerance, recovery
Severe ASSymptoms/LV function → need for intervention before elective surgeryFixed outflow: rhythm, preload, perfusion, monitoring
Severe MSSymptoms, obstruction, rhythm, PA pressure → treatment optionsTachycardia and excess filling pressure
Important MR/ARSeverity, ventricular response, independent intervention indicationReserve and loading/rhythm goals
Obstructive HCMCurrent obstruction/symptoms → anesthetic planAvoid tachycardia and abrupt preload/afterload reduction
B

Interpret reserve

symptoms + loading + trajectory
  • HF review Symptoms, recent admission, volume, LV/RV, valves, BP, kidneys and treatment response. HFpEF is not low risk by EF alone.
  • Discordance Verify technical quality, flow and complete study. One gradient cannot establish valve severity.
  • AS exception Asymptomatic moderate/severe AS, normal LV systolic function, appropriate echo within 1 year → elective low-risk surgery may proceed.
  • Higher-risk AS Symptoms or elevated-risk surgery need fuller valve/timing review. Severe AS does not prohibit every operation.
Example: fixed outflow obstruction → avoid an abrupt fall in perfusion pressure. A specific mechanism directs anesthetic care.
High echo PA pressure is a clue. Classify the mechanism and assess the RV.
A

Define the physiology

before treatment
  • Mechanism Pulmonary vascular, left-heart, lung or chronic thromboembolic disease.
  • Reserve Symptoms/function, oxygenation, RV findings, recent decompensation, current therapy and relevant invasive hemodynamics.
  • Treatment boundary PAH drugs are not the default for every elevated PA pressure.
  • Specialist question New vasodilator or invasive test needs a defined purpose. Involve PH expertise for significant disease.
B

Protect the RV

optimize • deliver • rescue
1 · OptimizeReversible contributors within the surgical window. Avoid hypoxemia, hypercapnia, acidosis and deterioration.
2 · Maintain therapyPrescribed PH drugs. Continuous prostacyclin requires uninterrupted delivery and a contingency plan.
3 · Plan supportAnesthetic goals, volume/perfusion targets, invasive monitoring, recovery location and rescue.
  • Fluid pitfall Both depletion and excessive loading can harm. Avoid a generic bolus for every low BP.
C

Other major modifiers

outside routine calculators
  • Complex circulation Moderate/complex congenital disease or LVAD → specialist anatomy/device, anticoagulation, monitoring and troubleshooting plan.
  • Recent stroke/TIA Elective delay ≥3 months is reasonable under AHA/ACC. Verify event and weigh harm of waiting.
Key
decisions
Unstable tachyarrhythmiaStabilize immediately. Treat the cause as well as the rate.
Stable AFRate/rhythm strategy + anticoagulation plan. Postoperative AF needs trigger, recurrence and stroke-prevention review.
A

Six CIED answers

before electrosurgery
DomainRequired answer
DevicePacemaker/ICD/CRT/leadless, manufacturer/model, team contact
FunctionRecent review, battery/function, dependence, underlying rhythm
ProcedureEMI, field, position and generator access
InterventionProgramming or verified magnet response, pacing mode, tachytherapies
ProtectionMonitoring + external pacing/defibrillation + responder
RestorationOwner, settings/therapies restored, postoperative function verified
B

Magnet and rhythm pitfalls

verify the actual system
  • ICD magnet Usually inhibits tachytherapies without asynchronous pacing. Dependence + anticipated EMI may require reprogramming.
  • Model/position Verify response and secure placement throughout surgery. Leadless systems need model-specific planning.
  • Rhythm review Rate, symptoms, conduction, QT drugs and electrolytes.
  • Recovery Monitor until planned settings/ICD therapies return. Document restoration before discharge.
Plan goals, monitoring and response before the operation.
A

Hemodynamic targets

individualize above the floor
Perfusion floor
MAP ≥60-65
mm Hg
Alternative floor
SBP ≥90
mm Hg
Selected deferral
BP ≥180/110
mm Hg, context required
  • Severe hypertension Selected CV-risk patients with recently poorly controlled BP and elective elevated-risk surgery: consider deferral. Verify measurement/context.
  • Target-organ injury Acute injury changes urgency. Individual physiology may need higher perfusion targets.
B

Specify the recovery resources

clinical indication, not an RCRI point
  • Volume/oxygen delivery Baseline volume target, expected loss, HF/RV constraints, oxygenation and anemia plan.
  • Monitoring What, duration, recovery location, escalation triggers. Select arterial line/telemetry/higher acuity for clinical/procedural need.
  • Drug/device recovery Restart conditions, laboratory review and restoration of settings.
  • Hypotension Treat promptly. Distinguish bleeding, vasodilation, ischemia, rhythm and RV failure. Focused echo may clarify unexpected instability when expertise is available.
C

Selective troponin surveillance

AHA/ACC option
  • When Consider 24- and 48-hour testing after elevated-risk surgery with known CVD, CVD symptoms, or age ≥65 plus CV risks.
  • Not routine Low-risk surgery without ischemic symptoms/signs does not warrant routine screening.
  • Action plan Same assay, available baseline, named reviewer and response. Suspected events need immediate assessment regardless of scheduled draws.
Troponin identifies injury. Mechanism determines treatment.
A

Name the phenotype

injury versus ischemia
From troponin to a clinical diagnosisOriginal decision schematic. A moving highlight follows the questions, not a treatment timeline. Treat instability immediately. Type 2 MI requires evidence of ischemia.1 · InjuryTroponin above the assay99th percentile2 · Acute or chronic?Rise/fall: acute injuryStable: chronic injury3 · Ischemia present?Acute injury + ischemiasupports MI
Original decision schematic. A moving highlight follows the questions, not a treatment timeline. Treat instability immediately. Type 2 MI requires evidence of ischemia.
A rise or fall in troponin supports acute myocardial injury. A persistently elevated, stable concentration supports chronic injury. Interpret the trend with assay characteristics and the clinical setting.
  • MINS Injury within 30 days of noncardiac surgery attributed to presumed ischemia, with or without MI symptoms/signs. Exclude a clearly nonischemic cause. MINS can occur without meeting MI criteria.
  • Other causes Sepsis, PE, acute HF, stroke and chronic elevation need separate assessment. MINS does not exclude acute plaque disease.
B

Respond to the event

stabilize → classify → act
1 · AssessSymptoms, ECG, BP/perfusion, bleeding, oxygenation and troponin trend. Stabilize.
2 · Find mechanismIschemic evidence and cause. Echo/targeted tests for consequential uncertainty. Type 2 MI still requires ischemia.
3 · EscalateSTEMI, persistent ischemia, shock or dangerous rhythm → urgent cardiology/surgical review. Account for fresh-wound bleeding.
  • Supply-demand injury Correct contributors and define the remaining CAD question.
  • Before discharge Diagnosis, risk reduction, medication decisions and named follow-up.
C

Avoid automatic treatment

MINS and postoperative AF
  • MANAGE Dabigatran reduced major vascular events in selected MINS patients. Not every troponin elevation warrants anticoagulation.
  • Selection Bleeding, kidneys, other antithrombotics, procedural restrictions and local prescribing rules.
  • Postoperative AF Correct pain, volume disturbance, hypoxemia, infection and electrolytes. Match rate/rhythm therapy to stability and physiology.
  • AF follow-up Balance embolic and surgical bleeding risks. Review recurrence/anticoagulation even if sinus rhythm returns.
Recommendation first: proceed, optimize then proceed, or defer for a defined issue.
A

Decision and supporting facts

fill with verified findings
  • Operation [ ] Procedure • date • urgency • harm of delay
  • Recommendation [ ] Decision • reason • attached conditions • residual risk
  • Stability [ ] Symptoms • examination • active disease/relevant negatives
  • Risk [ ] Model • verified inputs • endpoint/result • modifiers
  • Capacity [ ] Structured activity • limitation • uncertainty
  • Testing [ ] None further / question • test • result-dependent action
B

Care plan

assign each open loop
FieldRequired content
Timing / antithrombotics [ ]PCI/event dates • last doses • agreed constraints
Medication [ ]Drug/indication • actual final dose • NPO route • restart criteria/owner
Transplant [ ]Graft/interactions • troughs • insulin/PAH delivery
Anesthesia / recovery [ ]Hemodynamic goals • device • monitoring • location
Follow-up [ ]Surveillance reviewer • restart owner • next review • change triggers
C

Patient and team handoff

one reconciled instruction set
  • Make executable Medication names/dates, final dose and restart authority. Clear contact/urgent-action instructions for chest discomfort, worsening dyspnea, syncope or significant change.
  • Show uncertainty Distinguish verified findings from proposals. Historical reassuring tests cannot establish current symptom status.
  • Final check Recommendation visible to surgery/anesthesia. PCI, anticoagulation, device and surveillance response explicit. No further testing still requires a care plan.
Four synthetic cases: identify the decision before ordering the test.
A

Testing and reserve

stable patients
Key
decisions
Cataract surgeryAsymptomatic, stairs limited by knee pain.
DecisionLow-risk surgery → no coronary stress test solely for poor mobility.
FinishVerify stability, independent concerns and medication/procedure instructions.
Key
decisions
Major abdominal surgeryTreated HFrEF, euvolemic, limited capacity.
DecisionVerify symptoms, calculate risk, consider selective biomarkers.
FinishBiomarkers may change counseling/optimization/monitoring without angiography. Coronary testing needs an actionable result.
B

Timing and myocardial injury

avoid shortcuts
Key
decisions
Cancer surgeryDES for ACS 6 weeks ago. Surgery cannot wait many months.
DecisionBefore the 3-month time-sensitive anchor and within preferred elective delay.
FinishSurgery/anesthesia/interventional review: delay harm, DAPT bleeding and thrombosis. No threshold guarantees safety.
Key
decisions
Postoperative sepsisElevated troponin.
DecisionSerial pattern → acute injury → ischemic evidence/MI criteria.
FinishReview ECG, symptoms and perfusion while treating illness. Sepsis + troponin alone establishes neither MINS nor type 2 MI/DAPT indication.